Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
Command, provided for a group of advanced bases, a series of inter-
mediate airfields, a chain of fields between Anchorage and the United
States, and an extensive aircraft warning system. The first item pro-
voked the greatest amount of discussion among the services respon-
sible for protection of Alaska. The older theory of Alaskan defense
had been centered around the Seward-Anchorage areas, supplemented
by joint Army and Navy defense of naval installations at Kodiak
Island; and control of the North Pacific was naturally regarded as a
task of the Navy, operating from bases at Kodiak and Dutch Harbor.
The latter base, on Unalaska Island in the Aleutians, constituted the
westernmost installation in the area. Protection of Dutch Harbor was
a function of Army air units, and since that protection could not be
furnished without air bases in the vicinity, the Alaska Defense Com-
mand proposed to construct: a field on Umnak Island, sixty-five miles
west of Dutch Harbor. Naval authorities viewed the proposal as
undesirable, for Umnak had no adequate harbor development and
construction of the base would put an increased strain on sea com-
munications a t a time when shipping was at a premium."
There was, however, a cogent reason for development of an airfield
on Umnak, beyond considerations of immediate protection of Dutch
Harbor. Such a base would increase the striking range of Army
bombers, enabling them to command a radius 400 miles greater than
would be possible from such a point as Chignik, on the Alaska Penin-
sula. It was important that any hostile force be intercepted before it
could launch an attack, and it was likewise important that enemy
forces be prevented from establishing bases in the outer Aleutians.
For both contingencies, the existence of an airfield and a long-range
striking force in the Aleutians seemed to be necessary. The Aleutian
Islands comprised steppingstones which could lead in two directions,
and their offensive possibilities for American forces would be nqllified
by a lack of airfields, At the insistence of the Navy Department the
Umnak proposal was referred to the Joint Board of the Army and
Navy, and approval was given on 26 November 1 9 4 1 . ~ ~
The remainder of the air defense program met with little opposi-
tion. Airfield construction was proceeding under the direction of
Army engineers and the Civil Aeronautics Administration, although
in the colder areas of Alaska the work was impeded by arctic condi-
tions. Heavy rainfall, particularly along the southern and western
* See maps, pp. 305, 463.
I 68

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.