Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
were common to all theaters-health, morale, etc. Thus, though the
seven volumes are planned as a unified whole, certain volumes or com-
binations of volumes are to a certain degree discrete segments-as I,
11, and 111, or I, IV, and V, or VI by itself.
Certain matters of form require brief explanation. Considerations of
space have kept the detail of footnote citations, which appear at the
end of the volume, to a minimum. Except where the file number or
other evidence of physical location is an indispensable part of the cita-
tion, no attempt is made to locate the document. Similarly, the subject
in letters, memoranda, and other forms of military correspondence
usually has been omitted. In view of the multitude of documents that
must be cited, the very limited number of them that for some time will
be available for use of scholars outside official agencies, and the fluid
state in which official files are kept, it has seemed that documentation
for the purpose primarily of indicating the authority for statements
made would serve as a practical and useful compromise. The work is
based chiefly on the files of the United States Air Force and especially
on materials now filed with the Office of Air Force History. Scholars
accredited for research in official papers will find additional assistance
by reference to the fully documented AAF Historical Studies.
The problem of providing maps for a text of this sort has presented
its own peculiar difficulties. AAF operations were literally world-wide
in their scale and hardly less so in the early than in the later stages of
the war; even when some smaller segment of the story is presented,
such is the range of an airplane that the cartographer’s task becomes
chiefly that of showing relative positions and distances within areas of
vast extent rather than depicting the few hundred square yards so fre-
quently pertinent to an immediate situation in ground operations.
Moreover, the variety of air force combat operations, not to mention
other activities on the ground and in the air, multiplies greatly the
place names mentioned in the text. The choice tends, therefore, to
become one between a reference map, which by its very lack of
emphasis serves little or no illustrative purpose, and a map that is
frankly illustrative in character. In facing such a dilemma, the editors
have felt that there was no choice but to use maps designed primarily
for illustration of the text, and, where additional detail would diminish
or destroy the illustrative value of the map, they have not hesitated to
leave it out. The reader will find any standard atlas a useful supplement
to the text, but the editors have not felt called upon to provide still
xx

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.