Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 14 …with the commanding general, who in some instances moved in advance of promptings from Wash- ington…
  • p. 25 …EASTERNAND WESTERNAPPROACHESTO PANAMACANAL ALASKAAND THE ALEUTIANISLANDS PRINCIPALSEAAND AIR ROUTESAS DESIGNATEDBY WASH- ATLANTICFERRYINGAND TRANSPORTROUTESPRIORTO . . . . . . . . . . 297 30' 305…
  • p. 229 …the importance of the Far East Air Force in American strategy, the Air Staff in Wash…
  • p. 292 …Even so, there was in Wash- ington too little intelligence concerning the fluid tactical situation to…
  • p. 302 …The suggestion had been carried out in 1941 with the establishment of the U.S. Special…
  • p. 306 …work permanently with the British Joint Intelligence Committee in Wash- ington. The Combined Military Transportation Committee…
  • p. 389 …to delay the take-off was granted only after an appeal to Wash- ington.’O 3…
  • p. 442 …the time and attention of U.S. officers at Brisbane and of headquarters in Wash- ington…
  • p. 443 …Accidents delayed three planes en route, and one of the P-40’s was completely “washed…
  • p. 454 …promise of weakening the enemy. Attention already had been given in Wash- ington to establishment of…
  • p. 554 …In China, he found the procurement of necessary equipment, even be- fore the outbreak of war…
  • p. 636 …After further negotiations in Wash- ington, the Arnold-Towers-Portal agreement was adopted on z I…
  • p. 693 …Accordingly, Wash- ington was requested to send immediately 50 intelligence officers for training by the RAF…
  • p. 747 …before the Committee on Military Af- fairs, House of Representatives (Wash- 23. See, for instance, William…
  • p. 772 …The exact date of the arrival of air units is not known, as the latter source…
  • p. 799 …The road from Haiphong, Indo- China, to Yunnan was closed by the Vichy government in 1940…
  • p. 814 …Overseas (Ferrying), Air Min- istry, Memorandum on the Movement by Air of US. Forces to the…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
strategic bombardment of Germany, AWPD/I was on the whole a
remarkable document. True, neither the B-29, B-32, or longer-range
models were utilized, but in other major respects the pattern set in
1941was sound. The timing was most accurate. The tactics advocated
did prove feasible once the escort fighter was developed. The selection
of target objectives was almost identical with that suggested by the
postwar analysis of the United States Strategic Bombing Survey 14’-
which is to say that, if the analysis was well founded, the program
suggested in 1941 was more realistic than that which was later
followed ,
The several plans which have been described and the meetings in
which they were discussed were accorded a secret classification, but
security was less than perfect. Newspaper versions of the President’s
confidential report to administration leaders on the Atlantic confer-
ence were followed in November by scattered references to the
Victory Program which gave evidence of further leaks.150 O n 4
December, a summary of the Joint Board Estimate, with verbatim
extracts, was published in the Chicago Daily Tribune and other news-
papers. Congressional critics of the administration, on the very eve
of Pearl Harbor, registered protest against this “secret war plan,” now
no more secret than any other item emblazoned in headlines and
entombed in the Congressional Record. Regardless of the political
issues with which these plans were involved, from the military point
of view there is hardly room for debate. It was not an American tra-
dition to enter a war with a carefully conceived strategic concept.
For once, in this respect, the nation was prepared.
But as General Arnold later put it, “we had plans but not planes.”
AWPD/I could be rushed through in a week of frenzied work by a
handful of staff officers; it would take a nation at arms several years
to produce the aircraft and crews, the bases and technicians called for
in the plan. In the summer of 1941, there seems to have been an im-
pression among some of the military that war would not ’come until
the following spring. In such case our preparations, still far from
perfect, would have been more nearly adequate than they were when
the Japanese struck suddenly on that Sunday morning in December.
Yet in spite of the time element the defense measures which had been
taken since the beginning of 1939 allowed us to absorb our initial
losses and to begin, within less than a year, a limited offensive.
1 50

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.