Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
strategic bombardment of Germany, AWPD/I was on the whole a
remarkable document. True, neither the B-29, B-32, or longer-range
models were utilized, but in other major respects the pattern set in
1941was sound. The timing was most accurate. The tactics advocated
did prove feasible once the escort fighter was developed. The selection
of target objectives was almost identical with that suggested by the
postwar analysis of the United States Strategic Bombing Survey 14’-
which is to say that, if the analysis was well founded, the program
suggested in 1941 was more realistic than that which was later
followed ,
The several plans which have been described and the meetings in
which they were discussed were accorded a secret classification, but
security was less than perfect. Newspaper versions of the President’s
confidential report to administration leaders on the Atlantic confer-
ence were followed in November by scattered references to the
Victory Program which gave evidence of further leaks.150 O n 4
December, a summary of the Joint Board Estimate, with verbatim
extracts, was published in the Chicago Daily Tribune and other news-
papers. Congressional critics of the administration, on the very eve
of Pearl Harbor, registered protest against this “secret war plan,” now
no more secret than any other item emblazoned in headlines and
entombed in the Congressional Record. Regardless of the political
issues with which these plans were involved, from the military point
of view there is hardly room for debate. It was not an American tra-
dition to enter a war with a carefully conceived strategic concept.
For once, in this respect, the nation was prepared.
But as General Arnold later put it, “we had plans but not planes.”
AWPD/I could be rushed through in a week of frenzied work by a
handful of staff officers; it would take a nation at arms several years
to produce the aircraft and crews, the bases and technicians called for
in the plan. In the summer of 1941, there seems to have been an im-
pression among some of the military that war would not ’come until
the following spring. In such case our preparations, still far from
perfect, would have been more nearly adequate than they were when
the Japanese struck suddenly on that Sunday morning in December.
Yet in spite of the time element the defense measures which had been
taken since the beginning of 1939 allowed us to absorb our initial
losses and to begin, within less than a year, a limited offensive.
1 50

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.