Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A I R C O R P S P R E P A R E S F O R W A R , 1 9 3 9 - 4 1
program utilizing duplicate bombardment crews for the other types
should be initiated in 1943. For protection of the air bases, 10 pursuit
groups were to be located in the United Kingdom, 6 in the Near East.
To avoid overcongestion in those areas, the 4,000-mile-radius planes,
when available, would be based elsewhere, as in Newfoundland,
Greenland, Africa, or India.
T h e success of the whole program was predicated upon the ability
of American bombers to conduct daylight missions far into Europe.
In spite of earlier German and English experience, it was concluded
that “by employing large numbers of aircraft with high speed, good
defensive fire power, and high altitude,” it would be feasible to make
deep penetrations into Germany by day. But to guard against expected
improvements in German fighter defense, it was suggested that experi-
ments be begun immediately to develop a heavily armed and armored
escort fighter with long-range
T h e planners considered it improbable that a large-scale invasion of
Europe could be made before spring of 1944, which would coincide
with the climax of the bomber attack, and they believed that “if the
air offensive is successful, a land offensive may not be necessary.”
Complete victory through air power alone, however, could not be
assured, and provision was made for close support of ground forces in
that assault. T h e tactical air force should include 13 groups each of
light bombers (A-zo) and dive bombers, z photo reconnaissance
groups, I 08 observation squadrons, and 19 transport groups.’46Pursuit
units would include 5 groups set up as reserve for the British Isles and
such of the interceptor units there as might be spared.
Separate provisions were included for aircraft for training and for
the transport of air materie1.l4’ Estimates were made for the require-
ment in pilots (103,482) and in total personnel (2,164,916),~~*and
some general statements were given as to the methods of training.
T h e President in his directive had stated that he was “not suggesting
a detailed report,” but the air planners had, in effect, drawn up a
blueprint for the approaching war. From the vantage point of the
present it is easy to find flaws in this plan. Actual experience in the
war showed that the forces allocated for strategic defense in the Pa-
cific were inadequate, those for hemisphere defense too abundant. T h e
qualified faith in the ability of air power alone to conquer Germany
proved ungrounded, and the force scheduled for support of the inva-
sion was weak in fighters. But viewed solely as a program for the
‘49

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.