Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A I R C O R P S P R E P A R E S F O R W A K , 1 9 3 9 - 4 1
AAF staff had assumed on this occasion a position of equality with
those of the older arms.
T h e air planners, in framing AWPD/r, explicitly accepted the
general principles of ABC-I and the specific allocation of tasks in
RAINBOW No. 5. Under these guides the Army air mission was
conceived as entailing three tasks: to conduct air operations in defense
of the Western Hemisphere; to assist in the strategic defense in the
Pacific; and to wage an unremitting air offensive against Germany
and lands occupied by its forces-including, if necessary, the support
of a final invasion of the continent. T h e time schedule was somewhat
complicated. T h e war was viewed as consisting of three phases: ( I )
the period until M-day, characterized by rapid expansion of forces
and production, while measures short of war were being continued;
( 2 ) M-day until completion of preparations, characterized by a
strategic defensive against Japan and a mounting weight of attack
against Germany; and ( 3 ) the all-out attack on Europe. It was
assumed that the air offensive in Europe could be initiated in April
I 942, but that productive capacity and training would not support
the all-out offensive until April 1944. Consequently allocation of air
units was calculated in terms of an interim program and of an ulti-
mate force which included aircraft models as yet in the early experi-
mental stage.l4'
T o furnish air defense for the Western Hemisphere and for our
overseas possessions, a force of twenty-three bombardment and thirty-
one pursuit groups (each of the latter including three day and one
night interceptor squadrons) was planned. These forces were desig-
nated for specific bases in the continental United States; in the
Philippines, Hawaii, and Alaska; and in South America, the Carib-
bean, the Canal Zone, and the northeast area of North America. O n
the assumption that the air offensive against Germany would mini-
mize danger of an attack from that direction, these forces were in
general oriented toward Japan, and provision was made to transfer
six pursuit groups to Europe for the final 0 f f e n ~ i v e . l ~ ~
It is obvious that aircraft based in Alaska, Hawaii, and even on the
West Coast would contribute toward the strategic defensive against
Japan, and that beyond that the major responsibility would fall to
the Navy. But because of the importance of the Philippines in light
of the stiffening of U.S. policies in the Far East, it was proposed to
add to the air forces in those islands one pursuit and two heavy
'47

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.