Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 14 …with the commanding general, who in some instances moved in advance of promptings from Wash- ington…
  • p. 25 …EASTERNAND WESTERNAPPROACHESTO PANAMACANAL ALASKAAND THE ALEUTIANISLANDS PRINCIPALSEAAND AIR ROUTESAS DESIGNATEDBY WASH- ATLANTICFERRYINGAND TRANSPORTROUTESPRIORTO . . . . . . . . . . 297 30' 305…
  • p. 229 …the importance of the Far East Air Force in American strategy, the Air Staff in Wash…
  • p. 292 …Even so, there was in Wash- ington too little intelligence concerning the fluid tactical situation to…
  • p. 302 …The suggestion had been carried out in 1941 with the establishment of the U.S. Special…
  • p. 306 …work permanently with the British Joint Intelligence Committee in Wash- ington. The Combined Military Transportation Committee…
  • p. 389 …to delay the take-off was granted only after an appeal to Wash- ington.’O 3…
  • p. 442 …the time and attention of U.S. officers at Brisbane and of headquarters in Wash- ington…
  • p. 443 …Accidents delayed three planes en route, and one of the P-40’s was completely “washed…
  • p. 454 …promise of weakening the enemy. Attention already had been given in Wash- ington to establishment of…
  • p. 554 …In China, he found the procurement of necessary equipment, even be- fore the outbreak of war…
  • p. 636 …After further negotiations in Wash- ington, the Arnold-Towers-Portal agreement was adopted on z I…
  • p. 693 …Accordingly, Wash- ington was requested to send immediately 50 intelligence officers for training by the RAF…
  • p. 747 …before the Committee on Military Af- fairs, House of Representatives (Wash- 23. See, for instance, William…
  • p. 772 …The exact date of the arrival of air units is not known, as the latter source…
  • p. 799 …The road from Haiphong, Indo- China, to Yunnan was closed by the Vichy government in 1940…
  • p. 814 …Overseas (Ferrying), Air Min- istry, Memorandum on the Movement by Air of US. Forces to the…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
supported by charts and tables than those of the older services. That
the AAF made a separate report was most unusual; it was also highly
significant.
Within the War Department, responsibility for giving effect to the
President’s directive, in respect both to the Army’s ground and air
arms, devolved upon the War Plans Division. Late in July, Lt. Col.
Clayton L. Bissell, an air officer in that division, consulted with
General Arnold on the best method of determining the Army’s avia-
tion needs. It was indicative of the temper of the AAF that, in spite
of its limited autonomy under AR 95-5 of 2 0 June 1941,* a decision
was reached to allow the newly formed Air War Plans Division to
prepare the estimate independently as an Air Staff agency rather than
as individuals subordinate to the General Staff’s WPD. And AWPD
was not as unprepared for the task as might be expected in view of
its extreme youth. It included a number of officers, previously associ-
ated with the Air Corps Tactical School, who were deeply imbued
with the potentialities of air power. One of these, Maj. Haywood S.
Hansell, Jr., had accumulated target information in the intelligence
section of the Office of the Chief of the Air Corps and had just
returned from England with fresh data and a familiarity with RAF
experience. Actual authorship of a military document is seldom
known. A number of officers from the several staff agencies of the
AAF, including the OCAC, contributed information which went into
AWPD/I. But the document was put together by a committee con-
sisting of Col. Harold L. George, division chief, Lt. Col. Kenneth N.
Walker, and Majs. Laurence S. Kuter and Haywood S. Hansell, and
apparently these airmen were chiefly responsible for the strategic
concepts.’ 38
Work on the plan began on 4 August; completed on the I Ith, it
was accepted by G-3 after an oral presentation and drawn up in final
form the following day. Subsequently it was approved by WPD,
General Arnold, General Marshall, Mr. Lovett, and Mr. Stimson, and
was included in the Joint Board’s report of I I September.13’ Perhaps
its ready acceptance was partly due to the pressure of time in meeting
the President’s directive, for irrespective of the intrinsic merits of
AWPD/I, the views expressed therein were not wholly consistent
with those of the W a r Department. Tacitly, though not legally, the
* See above, p. 1x5.
146

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.