Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 2 THE UNIVERSITYOF CHICAGOPRESS, CHICAGO8 LONDON The University of Toronto Press, Toronto 5, Canada Copyright 1948 by…
  • p. 48 …An Associated Press dispatch of 10 October gave a contemporary judgment of the importance of this…
  • p. 55 …Air Service (Corps) found it difficult to press vigorously for reorgani- zation and, by default, leadership…
  • p. 56 …In 1919the W a r Department was pressing for a drastic revision of the military establishment…
  • p. 61 …It held that there was no danger of an air attack on the United States and…
  • p. 64 …GHQ Air Forcq a trial than to press for more radical measures, and Howell’s group…
  • p. 75 …Powerful air attacks resolutely pressed home could never be completely stopped, but their effects could best…
  • p. 98 …based air operations in defense of the United States and its overseas posses~ions.’~T w…
  • p. 99 …General Westover’s report concluded that “all Air Force units could be concentrated on either coast…
  • p. 130 …the Admiralty began to press for control of naval air units, while the army attempted to…
  • p. 149 …basic and advanced Responsibility for crew and unit train- ing was vested in the GHQ Air…
  • p. 164 …A m y air units in the Territory existed primarily for the defense of this and…
  • p. 176 …no military alliances were made which would commit the United States to war; the plans only…
  • p. 278 …There were also grounds for hoping that heavy bomber units now based on Darwin might increase…
  • p. 285 …From 1938 the United States had invoked sanctions against Japan in the form of moral em…
  • p. 287 …Over-all Strategy and lmmediate Deployment On 2 2 December, the press announced dramatically the arrival…
  • p. 289 …ground units sent in that direction were not destined for immediate combat. No major invasion of…
  • p. 323 …Seizure of bases in Canada or Mexico for later attacks on the United States. Capture of…
  • p. 366 …United state^,^ and the British them- selves were forced to withdraw some pilots from combat units…
  • p. 380 …Upon the request of the Ferrying Command, the State Depart- ment again pressed for an answer…
  • p. 397 …the summer and fall, first as the United States Middle East Air Force and later as…
  • p. 430 …Attempts had been made to replace these obsolete craft by purchase from the United States, but…
  • p. 440 …But as the Japanese pressed forward the Americans were given no opportunity to get set. The…
  • p. 463 …personnel that would be reassigned to infantry units whose rosters already included many representatives of the…
  • p. 552 …pines and more recently of American air units operating in the Netherlands East Indies, he was…
  • p. 560 …Moreover, examination proved that most of the basic equipment of the units, including badly needed trucks…
  • p. 563 …Grady arrived from the United States for a comprehensive survey of Indian resources with reference to…
  • p. 564 …TO C H I N A graphic units, and unfavorable atmospheric conditions combined to make high…
  • p. 607 …Thus the AAF units engaged in the anti-U-boat war became almost a t once…
  • p. 628 …Army air bombardment units would operate offensively in collaboration with the Royal Air Force, primarily against…
  • p. 658 …was to operate in the United Kingdom.14' All air units initially based there were to…
  • p. 683 …of the units of the infant Eighth until their departure for the United Kingdom several months…
  • p. 691 …The RAF proposed that American fighter units be integrated with its own under a plan eventually…
  • p. 748 …533.) By 1928he was (Patrick, United States in the Air, pp. 190-91.) 38. Charges of…
  • p. 770 …y.W D Press Release, 2 1 June 1941. 9 1 . AR 95-5, 3a. 92…
  • p. 857 …Presque Isle, 344, 347-49, 641, 644-45 Press comment: B-17, 662-63; danger of…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R IT
that is, while lend-lease was being debated and while the staff con-
versations were in progress I2’-and they were brought to fruition in
a conference on board HMS Prince of Wales in the Atlantic off
Argentia, Newfoundland. The only official document published after
the meeting, the so-called Atlantic Charter of 14 August, was politi-
cal rather than military in nature.”’ The signators were frank enough
in their denunciation of the “Hitlerite government” and in their faith
in the “final destruction of the Nazi tyranny,” and they made passing
allusion to “steps which their countries are respectively taking for
their safety” in the face of Nazi aggression. There was no overt refer-
ence to joint Anglo-American military operations, though there was
pointed reference to the attendance of “high-ranking officers of their
military, naval, and air services.” The President on his return identi-
fied in a press conference the members of the U.S. ‘delegation, which
included the chiefs of staff, General Arnold, and the heads of the
service war planning agen~ies.“~Even in the absence of a fuller report
on the conference it was obvious to any literate citizen that those
officers had not boarded the Prince of Wales to discuss the Four
Freedoms.
After the return of the President and his party, the problems of
joint strategy were examined by the military staffs, both in discussion
of ABC-I and of a new review of general strategy presented in a
paper by the three British chiefs of staff on I I August.12*This con-
sisted of a concise appreciation of the current situation in the several
areas of actual and threatened conflict and an analysis of present and
future strategy; its outlook was, properly, British rather than joint.
Between the drafting of ABC-I and the presentation of this review
a new factor of extraordinary importance had occurred in the attack
on the U.S.S.R. by Hitler. Initial German victories did not excite too
much optimism for Soviet success, but Germany’s preoccupation with
a major eastern front a t least precluded any chance of an invasion
of England in 1941.Whether the new situation brought any radical
change in British thinking or, indeed, whether the review was any-
thing more than an elaboration of views expressed in ABC-I is not
clear, but to the U.S. chiefs of staff it seemed that the strategic sum-
mary now presented departed somewhat from the principles earlier
agreed upon.
The British started with the familiar assumption that Germany was
too strong to attack frontally without a preliminary undermining of
142

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.