Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 14 …with the commanding general, who in some instances moved in advance of promptings from Wash- ington…
  • p. 25 …EASTERNAND WESTERNAPPROACHESTO PANAMACANAL ALASKAAND THE ALEUTIANISLANDS PRINCIPALSEAAND AIR ROUTESAS DESIGNATEDBY WASH- ATLANTICFERRYINGAND TRANSPORTROUTESPRIORTO . . . . . . . . . . 297 30' 305…
  • p. 229 …the importance of the Far East Air Force in American strategy, the Air Staff in Wash…
  • p. 292 …Even so, there was in Wash- ington too little intelligence concerning the fluid tactical situation to…
  • p. 302 …The suggestion had been carried out in 1941 with the establishment of the U.S. Special…
  • p. 306 …work permanently with the British Joint Intelligence Committee in Wash- ington. The Combined Military Transportation Committee…
  • p. 389 …to delay the take-off was granted only after an appeal to Wash- ington.’O 3…
  • p. 442 …the time and attention of U.S. officers at Brisbane and of headquarters in Wash- ington…
  • p. 443 …Accidents delayed three planes en route, and one of the P-40’s was completely “washed…
  • p. 454 …promise of weakening the enemy. Attention already had been given in Wash- ington to establishment of…
  • p. 554 …In China, he found the procurement of necessary equipment, even be- fore the outbreak of war…
  • p. 636 …After further negotiations in Wash- ington, the Arnold-Towers-Portal agreement was adopted on z I…
  • p. 693 …Accordingly, Wash- ington was requested to send immediately 50 intelligence officers for training by the RAF…
  • p. 747 …before the Committee on Military Af- fairs, House of Representatives (Wash- 23. See, for instance, William…
  • p. 772 …The exact date of the arrival of air units is not known, as the latter source…
  • p. 799 …The road from Haiphong, Indo- China, to Yunnan was closed by the Vichy government in 1940…
  • p. 814 …Overseas (Ferrying), Air Min- istry, Memorandum on the Movement by Air of US. Forces to the…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
completed; the specific role of the Army was described in a War
Department operations plan and a concentration plan.1zo
Insofar as general concepts were concerned, RAINBOW No. 5
accepted all the major theses of ABC-I; that is, the assumptions, the
over-all strategy, and the principles governing strategic direction and
theater command were identical. In essence, RAINBOW No. 5 con-
stituted a more detailed plan for the accomplishment of the tasks
assigned to the United States in the staff conversations. For the Army,
M-day would be designated only by direction of the Secretary of
War, though certain tasks of a precautionary nature might precede
M-day or any formal declaration of war.
The plan designated the coastal frontiers and defense commands to
be activated on M-day within areas of U.S. strategic direction, and
the areas to be occupied in Europe. For each command, the mission of
the Army (including air forces) and the Navy was described, and a
detailed breakdown was given, by specific units, of the forces
allocated.
Most Army forces available for M-day were to be deployed either
in Western Hemisphere defense commands or in the Hawaiian and
Philippine coastal frontiers, with strictly defensive missions. The only
exception was in the European theater, and even there, where the
United States was to exert its principal effort, initial operations were
to be preponderantly naval (protection of shipping) and aerial (bom-
bardment of Germany). Hence the Army forces set up for early
deployment in that theater were not large: pursuit units and ground
forces for the defense of US.base areas in the United Kingdom and
for relief of British troops in Iceland and Ireland; a token force
(ground) to aid in defense of England; and the bombardment force
for the air attack on Germany.
In addition to these forces assigned for deployment before or on
M-day, both a strategic and a general reserve were established. It was
understood that even for defensive purposes certain tactical offensives
of a precautionary nature might be required-the President, for ex-
ample, was publicly declaring our disinclination to allow Hitler to
seize certain strategic spots in the Atlantic.121 Hence the strategic
reserve was set up in increments with those tasks in mind: a 2 5 M
Force (that is, a force to be brought into existence on M-day plus 25)
to aid Marines in occupying Dakar or Freetown, or in defending the
Azores, Cape Verde, or Canary Islands against possible Nazi aggres-
140

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.