Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
completed; the specific role of the Army was described in a War
Department operations plan and a concentration plan.1zo
Insofar as general concepts were concerned, RAINBOW No. 5
accepted all the major theses of ABC-I; that is, the assumptions, the
over-all strategy, and the principles governing strategic direction and
theater command were identical. In essence, RAINBOW No. 5 con-
stituted a more detailed plan for the accomplishment of the tasks
assigned to the United States in the staff conversations. For the Army,
M-day would be designated only by direction of the Secretary of
War, though certain tasks of a precautionary nature might precede
M-day or any formal declaration of war.
The plan designated the coastal frontiers and defense commands to
be activated on M-day within areas of U.S. strategic direction, and
the areas to be occupied in Europe. For each command, the mission of
the Army (including air forces) and the Navy was described, and a
detailed breakdown was given, by specific units, of the forces
allocated.
Most Army forces available for M-day were to be deployed either
in Western Hemisphere defense commands or in the Hawaiian and
Philippine coastal frontiers, with strictly defensive missions. The only
exception was in the European theater, and even there, where the
United States was to exert its principal effort, initial operations were
to be preponderantly naval (protection of shipping) and aerial (bom-
bardment of Germany). Hence the Army forces set up for early
deployment in that theater were not large: pursuit units and ground
forces for the defense of US.base areas in the United Kingdom and
for relief of British troops in Iceland and Ireland; a token force
(ground) to aid in defense of England; and the bombardment force
for the air attack on Germany.
In addition to these forces assigned for deployment before or on
M-day, both a strategic and a general reserve were established. It was
understood that even for defensive purposes certain tactical offensives
of a precautionary nature might be required-the President, for ex-
ample, was publicly declaring our disinclination to allow Hitler to
seize certain strategic spots in the Atlantic.121 Hence the strategic
reserve was set up in increments with those tasks in mind: a 2 5 M
Force (that is, a force to be brought into existence on M-day plus 25)
to aid Marines in occupying Dakar or Freetown, or in defending the
Azores, Cape Verde, or Canary Islands against possible Nazi aggres-
140

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.