Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
editors or to the contributors to this and succeeding volumes and that
the sum thus saved will be used to reduce the sale cost of each volume.
And now a few words about the authors. For obvious reasons they
were chosen from the staff which had been engaged in the program
during the war. They bring to their respective assignments, then, a
familiarity with the problems, the personalities, and the sources gained
in several years of research, often at the headquarters most intimately
concerned. Several were civilian employees of the Historical Office in
Washington, but for the most part they were officers who had served
in the Air Staff there, in a Zone of the Interior command, or in a thea-
ter of operations. It would be naive to suppose that their interpretations
have been unaffected by their military experiences. But the authors,
like most members of the wartime Army, were civilians in uniform
rather than professional soldiers. In all cases the period of academic
training and practice exceeded in length that of military indoctrination
and service; the authors were citizens and taxpayers before, and after,
their tour of military duty, and they have felt called on to write no
official apologia. Service loyalties they undoubtedly carried with them
in returning to their academic posts, but not to the degree that their
critical faculties have been submerged. They have written as present
scholars rather than as former Air Carps officers.
Of the individual contributors to this volume, the following bio-
graphical facts are pertinent. Maj. James L. Cate, as a member of the
staff of the Historical Office, devoted his attention chiefly to the prob-
lems of strategic bombardment and after June 1944served as historical
officer of the Twentieth Air Force. Miss Kathleen Williams’ research
and writing, done under the immediate direction of the chief of the
Operational History Branch, ranged over varied fields of AAF organi-
zation and operation according to the immediate need of the moment.
Maj. Richard L. Watson for three years carried the main responsibility
in the office for the Southwest Pacific; Maj. Kramer J. Rohfleisch held
a similar responsibility for the remainder of the Pacific; and Maj.
Herbert Weaver bore the responsibility for the China-Burma-India
theater. Capt. William A. Goss served as historian with the Fourth Air
Force and was subsequently brought into AAF Headquarters for study
of continental air defenses. Lt. Arthur B. Ferguson divided his atten-
tion between antisubmarine operations and the Combined Bomber
Offensive. Capt. John D. Carter served first as historian of the South
Atlantic Wing, Air Transport Command, and after chat at Headquar-
xviii

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.