Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 14 …with the commanding general, who in some instances moved in advance of promptings from Wash- ington…
  • p. 25 …EASTERNAND WESTERNAPPROACHESTO PANAMACANAL ALASKAAND THE ALEUTIANISLANDS PRINCIPALSEAAND AIR ROUTESAS DESIGNATEDBY WASH- ATLANTICFERRYINGAND TRANSPORTROUTESPRIORTO . . . . . . . . . . 297 30' 305…
  • p. 229 …the importance of the Far East Air Force in American strategy, the Air Staff in Wash…
  • p. 292 …Even so, there was in Wash- ington too little intelligence concerning the fluid tactical situation to…
  • p. 302 …The suggestion had been carried out in 1941 with the establishment of the U.S. Special…
  • p. 306 …work permanently with the British Joint Intelligence Committee in Wash- ington. The Combined Military Transportation Committee…
  • p. 389 …to delay the take-off was granted only after an appeal to Wash- ington.’O 3…
  • p. 442 …the time and attention of U.S. officers at Brisbane and of headquarters in Wash- ington…
  • p. 443 …Accidents delayed three planes en route, and one of the P-40’s was completely “washed…
  • p. 454 …promise of weakening the enemy. Attention already had been given in Wash- ington to establishment of…
  • p. 554 …In China, he found the procurement of necessary equipment, even be- fore the outbreak of war…
  • p. 636 …After further negotiations in Wash- ington, the Arnold-Towers-Portal agreement was adopted on z I…
  • p. 693 …Accordingly, Wash- ington was requested to send immediately 50 intelligence officers for training by the RAF…
  • p. 747 …before the Committee on Military Af- fairs, House of Representatives (Wash- 23. See, for instance, William…
  • p. 772 …The exact date of the arrival of air units is not known, as the latter source…
  • p. 799 …The road from Haiphong, Indo- China, to Yunnan was closed by the Vichy government in 1940…
  • p. 814 …Overseas (Ferrying), Air Min- istry, Memorandum on the Movement by Air of US. Forces to the…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
for an eventual land offensive against Germany; and capture of posi-
tions from which eventually the offensive could be launched.
The mission of the several services was described in most general
terms. In respect to aviation, it would be the policy of the associated
powers to achieve as rapidly as possible “superiority of air strength
over that of the enemy, particularly in long-range striking forces.”
The Air Corps was to support ground and naval forces in defense of
the Western Hemisphere and of U.S. overseas possessions and bases,
and in operations in the Atlantic area. Of special significance, “U.S.
Army air bombardment units [would] operate offensively in collabo-
ration with the Royal Air Force, primarily against German Military
Power at its source.’’
T o insure sound direction of the united effort, two principles of
command were accepted: unity of command within each theater and
integrity of national forces. The danger zones of the worId were
divided into “areas” and the United States or Britain was charged with
the strategic direction of all forces of the associated powers operating
within each of those areas. Forces of either power operating under
strategic direction of the other were not to be distributed in detail
or attached to the ally’s units, but were normally to function as
organized task forces performing specific missions. In joint tactical
operations, that officer of either power who was senior in rank or
grade would command.
The allocation of areas of responsibility was dictated largely by
the predominant interests of the respective powers-that is, the eastern
Atlantic, the Mediterranean, and Near East areas went to the British,
the western Atlantic and the Pacific to the United States. Arrange-
ments for the Far East, in which the United States, Great Britain,
and the Netherlands each had vital interests, did not conform to this
general pattern. There, command of naval forces was divided between
the commanders in chief of the British China Fleet and the U.S.
Asiatic Fleet; army ground and air forces in each territory were to
operate under their own commanders, with such co-ordination as
might be effected in the theater.
An annex to the report’” listed, by areas, the forces to be made
available for deployment by both powers and the general mission
therein of each of the services. Deployment estimates were not uni-
formly precise, being usually based on calculated strengths as of I
April 1941, but in some cases being projected into the future. Air
1 3 8

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.