Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
wealth, 50 per cent; U.S.S.R., 3 0 per cent; China, 10 per cent; other
nations, 10 per cent.'"
President Roosevelt, anxious that as many planes as possible be sent
to the British, requested from the Secretary of War an estimate of the
number of aircraft, by types, which could be provided the British
during each remaining month of the fiscal year. As a basis for calcula-
tion, he suggested maintaining the existing agreement until 3 I Decem-
ber, thereafter allotting to the British 5 0 per cent of the total monthly
production until 3 0 June 1942. The estimates which Mr. Stimson
presented, following air staff figures, allowed for more than 50 per cent
export in some types; but he strongly urged that until minimum
defense requirements were met, we reserve heavy bomber production
for the AAF. The President agreed that Hawaii and the Philippines
should receive their allotted heavy bomber groups but hoped to get
some B-17's or B - 2 4 , ~for England after February 1942.~''
Meanwhile another proposed allocation scheme had been prepared
in London by representatives of the U S . and British staffs. Known
informally as the Slessor Agreement, this plan called for a severe
curtailment of the 54-group program to a total of 3,5 16 tactical planes.
Production thus released should be made available to the British unul
such time as the United States might enter the war, when capacity
should be divided as the situation demanded.l13 Subsequent discussion
tentatively raised the allotment to the AAF by 2 5 per cent, to 4,395
planes, but even this figure was unsatisfactory to the Air Staff. Appar-
ently the Slessor plan was not approved, and as a practical compromise,
AWPD/z was revised to take cognizance of the most recent produc-
tion figures and the latest commitments to the U.S.S.R."" Approved
by the Chief of Staff and promulgated by General Arnold on 29
October as a "basis for establishing priorities for the allocation of air-
craft," this schedule made available to the AAF 4,189 tactical planes,
6,634 to Great Britain, 1,835 to the Soviet Union, 407 to China, and
109 to other nations. On 3 December, the War Department set up a
rule of thumb to guide lend-lease allocations, ground and air alike. The
Soviet protocol was to be maintained as a minimum, with increased
supplies being sent as soon as possible. Lend-lease materiel was, in the
absence of other qualifying factors, to be divided thus: 40 per cent to
the United Kingdom; 40 per cent to the U.S.S.R.; 10 per cent to
China; 10 per cent to other powers. Where there were no other com-
134

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.