Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 14 …with the commanding general, who in some instances moved in advance of promptings from Wash- ington…
  • p. 25 …EASTERNAND WESTERNAPPROACHESTO PANAMACANAL ALASKAAND THE ALEUTIANISLANDS PRINCIPALSEAAND AIR ROUTESAS DESIGNATEDBY WASH- ATLANTICFERRYINGAND TRANSPORTROUTESPRIORTO . . . . . . . . . . 297 30' 305…
  • p. 229 …the importance of the Far East Air Force in American strategy, the Air Staff in Wash…
  • p. 292 …Even so, there was in Wash- ington too little intelligence concerning the fluid tactical situation to…
  • p. 302 …The suggestion had been carried out in 1941 with the establishment of the U.S. Special…
  • p. 306 …work permanently with the British Joint Intelligence Committee in Wash- ington. The Combined Military Transportation Committee…
  • p. 389 …to delay the take-off was granted only after an appeal to Wash- ington.’O 3…
  • p. 442 …the time and attention of U.S. officers at Brisbane and of headquarters in Wash- ington…
  • p. 443 …Accidents delayed three planes en route, and one of the P-40’s was completely “washed…
  • p. 454 …promise of weakening the enemy. Attention already had been given in Wash- ington to establishment of…
  • p. 554 …In China, he found the procurement of necessary equipment, even be- fore the outbreak of war…
  • p. 636 …After further negotiations in Wash- ington, the Arnold-Towers-Portal agreement was adopted on z I…
  • p. 693 …Accordingly, Wash- ington was requested to send immediately 50 intelligence officers for training by the RAF…
  • p. 747 …before the Committee on Military Af- fairs, House of Representatives (Wash- 23. See, for instance, William…
  • p. 772 …The exact date of the arrival of air units is not known, as the latter source…
  • p. 799 …The road from Haiphong, Indo- China, to Yunnan was closed by the Vichy government in 1940…
  • p. 814 …Overseas (Ferrying), Air Min- istry, Memorandum on the Movement by Air of US. Forces to the…
T H E A I R C O R P S P R E P A R E S F O R W A R , 1 9 3 9 - 4 1
less expected British production, should be referred to the Office of
Production Management. British and U.S. military authorities in
Washington should then suggest any modifications required by the
realities of production potentials and fix the relative priorities of the
various types of munition^."^
The Anglo-American mission, proceeding to Moscow, met with
Stalin and his staff. On I October 1941,the first Soviet protocol was
signed by Mr. W.A. Harriman, Lord Beaverbrook, and Foreign Com-
missar Vyacheslav Molotov. The United States and Great Britain each
agreed to furnish the Soviet Air Force, in the period ending 3 0 June
1942, with 1,800 aircraft.'"' The U.S. mission had included a number
of air officers competent to offer technical advice, but details of the
air section of the protocol were elaborated later in the month in
Washington by General Arnold and Capt. H.H. Balfour, British
Under Secretary of State for Air.'Og According to the London agree-
ment, information concerning Soviet needs should have allowed the
rapid completion of plans for the so-called Victory Program. There
was hardly time in the crowded weeks before Pearl Harbor to co-ordi-
nate the several estimates with industrial potentials, but those estimates
were to form the basis of the Victory Program drawn up in the early
days of the war.
Future plans were of small help to the AAF in meeting current
needs, now rendered most urgent by growing pessimism over the
situation in the Pacific. Hence the task of maintaining firm and equi-
table commitments for short-term allocation of aircraft became pro-
gressively more difficult. At the Roosevelt-Churchill conference at
sea in mid-August, Generals Marshall and Arnold had made agree-
ments with the British concerning the number of AAF airplanes to be
made available through lend-lease.' lo On 9 September, General
Arnold's staff produced a new plan, AWPD/2, to cover the period I
October 1941-30 June 1942. AWPD/z recommended that the pro-
posed anti-Axis pool receive all aircraft produced under defense aid,
all British and other foreign contract planes, and I 5 per cent of combat
types built for the AAF. Out of an estimated total of 14,802 tactical
planes, this would give the pool 9,708 (66 per cent) and the AAF
5,094 (34 per cent). This figure was considered the minimum defense
requirement of the AAF; when it had been reached, 3 0 per cent of the
AAF's orders might be diverted for foreign needs. The pool should be
divided according to some such ratio as follows: British Common-
' 3 3

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.