Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A I R C O R P S P R E P A R E S F O R W A R , 1 9 3 9 - 4 1
less expected British production, should be referred to the Office of
Production Management. British and U.S. military authorities in
Washington should then suggest any modifications required by the
realities of production potentials and fix the relative priorities of the
various types of munition^."^
The Anglo-American mission, proceeding to Moscow, met with
Stalin and his staff. On I October 1941,the first Soviet protocol was
signed by Mr. W.A. Harriman, Lord Beaverbrook, and Foreign Com-
missar Vyacheslav Molotov. The United States and Great Britain each
agreed to furnish the Soviet Air Force, in the period ending 3 0 June
1942, with 1,800 aircraft.'"' The U.S. mission had included a number
of air officers competent to offer technical advice, but details of the
air section of the protocol were elaborated later in the month in
Washington by General Arnold and Capt. H.H. Balfour, British
Under Secretary of State for Air.'Og According to the London agree-
ment, information concerning Soviet needs should have allowed the
rapid completion of plans for the so-called Victory Program. There
was hardly time in the crowded weeks before Pearl Harbor to co-ordi-
nate the several estimates with industrial potentials, but those estimates
were to form the basis of the Victory Program drawn up in the early
days of the war.
Future plans were of small help to the AAF in meeting current
needs, now rendered most urgent by growing pessimism over the
situation in the Pacific. Hence the task of maintaining firm and equi-
table commitments for short-term allocation of aircraft became pro-
gressively more difficult. At the Roosevelt-Churchill conference at
sea in mid-August, Generals Marshall and Arnold had made agree-
ments with the British concerning the number of AAF airplanes to be
made available through lend-lease.' lo On 9 September, General
Arnold's staff produced a new plan, AWPD/2, to cover the period I
October 1941-30 June 1942. AWPD/z recommended that the pro-
posed anti-Axis pool receive all aircraft produced under defense aid,
all British and other foreign contract planes, and I 5 per cent of combat
types built for the AAF. Out of an estimated total of 14,802 tactical
planes, this would give the pool 9,708 (66 per cent) and the AAF
5,094 (34 per cent). This figure was considered the minimum defense
requirement of the AAF; when it had been reached, 3 0 per cent of the
AAF's orders might be diverted for foreign needs. The pool should be
divided according to some such ratio as follows: British Common-
' 3 3

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.