Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
2 6,416; monthly replacements, 2,2 76. Current procurement schedules
used in these estimates listed as on order or on approved programs
72,183 military aircraft, of which 43,320 were for the AAF, 9,457 for
Army defense aid (mostly for Britain), and 8,395 for direct British
contracts. T o attain its own goal of approximately 60,000 planes, the
AAF proposed to add to current schedules a fill-in program of 16,437
aircraft."
T h e huge forces recommended in AWPD/ I reflected the offensive
mission contemplated for the AAF in the new strategic plans. And just
as those plans were based on combined Anglo-American operations,
so also must plans for the vast munitions program be based on the needs
of the two powers and on their combined production potential. Ger-
many's attack on the U.S.S.R. on 2 2 June gave England a most valu-
able ally, but Soviet munitions requirements added to the problems of
allocation. Preliminary negotiations with a Soviet military mission
began in Washington in early August, and the U.S.S.R. was promised
among other items forty P-40's and five B-~g's.''~In September a
combined Anglo-American mission with full powers to formulate a
long-term supply program departed for Moscow. The American dele-
gates, en route, stopped over a t London and there, with the British
War Cabinet and the U.S. special observers, investigated the possi-
bilities of the proposed combined munitions program.
The British had prepared, a t the instigation of President Roosevelt,
an estimate of munitions requirements similar to that submitted by the
Joint Board on I I September.'O' From the information thus provided,
the President hoped to have formulated a Victory Program for the
creation of a huge pool of weapons for the common service of nations
opposing the Axis. Between 17 and 2 0 September, the British and
American estimates were examined jointly. Aircraft requirements
listed in AWPD/I were accepted tentatively, subject to deletion of
ten medium bombardment and twelve pursuit groups for which desig-
nated bases could not be provided. British requirements amounted to
49,385 planes, including first-line strength and wastage for the RAF
and the Fleet Air Arm, but not trainers or strategic reserve. Of these,
the British calculated they could build 35,832 by July 1943, leaving a
deficit of 13,553 to be made up by the United States.'" It was decided
in the London conference that the estimates of Soviet needs, when
obtained, should be added to these figures and that the resulting totals,
1 3 2

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.