Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A I R C O R P S P R E P A R E S F O R W A R , 1 9 3 9 - 4 1
Apparently the report was not officially approved at the governmental
level; yet in spirit if not in letter, its principles served as a guide to
aircraft allocation.
T h e decision was not an easy one to make. It promised to retard
further the limping 54-group program, considered our minimum
requirement for defense. A narrow view, or one motivated by pessi-
mism concerning England’s chance of survival, might have suggested
that we arm ourselves first, then extend aid. T h e situation in the Pacific
lent support to such an attitude. T h e policy actually followed, how-
ever, had been described in the President’s “Arsenal of Democracy”
radio address of 29 December 1940: “AS planes. . . are produced, your
Government, with its defense experts, can then determine how best to
use them to defend this hemisphere. T h e decision as to how much
shall be sent abroad and how much shall remain at home must be made
on the basis of our over-all military necessities.” lo’ T h e only satis-
factory solution lay in the increased production recommended in
ABC-2. New estimates, submitted in &/lay by the W a r Plans Division
of the General Staff to satisfy the contingencies anticipated in ABC-2,
called for 4,200 planes a month for the AAF and the British, 800 for
the US.Navy.’’’ This would total 60,000 aircraft a year, some 10,000
more than the President’s goal which was far from being realized.
Nevertheless, a new long-term objective and a new principle of col-
laboration in satisfying munitions requirements were soon to be
projected.
O n 9 July 1941, President Roosevelt requested the secretaries of
W a r and the Navy to prepare for him an estimate of “over-all produc-
tion requirements required to defeat our potential enemies,” on the
basis of which the Office of Production Management could relate our
military needs to the practical realities of production facilities. In
compliance, the secretaries presented on I I September a Joint Board
Estimate of United States Over-All Production Requirements. T h e
section dealing with Army air needs had been prepared by the newly
created Air W a r Plans Division, in a document known as AWPD/r.
T h e estimate of forces required for accomplishing the AAF mission
was based on a plan to develop first an interim air force with models
now in production or in advanced stages of development, and even-
tually, by 1944, to produce a force including an experimental bomber
with a 4,000-mile radius. Requirements included: trainers, 37,os I ;
tactical planes, interim force, 2 2,676; tactical planes, ultimate force,
1 3 1

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.