Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
to continue. In an address to Congress on 6 January 1941, President
Roosevelt suggested the means; 9 5 it became law with the defense-aid
act of 11 March, generally known as the Lend-Lease Under
this arrangement air materiel continued to be the most important item
of export, and it was essential to the success of the Air Corps program
that allocations under the new act be constantly reviewed in the light
of “changing political and strategic conditions.” In the machinery set
up for administering lend-lease, the Joint Aircraft Committee was
designated to serve as the Defense Aid Supply Committee for all avia-
tion materiel. The JAC thus acquired important administrative respon-
sibilities, but the broad policies governing the allotment of aid were
determined by the Pre~ident.~‘The fundamental policy for aircraft
was established within a few weeks, though the administrative details
continued to be subject to constant modification.
In the first lend-lease directive, the President extended its benefits to
Great Britain,g8thereby initiating the most powerful of the “measures
short of war” to aid that nation. It was not at all certain, however, that
such measures would be sufficient or that the United States could main-
tain its neutrality. On 27 March, Congress authorized the appropriation
of $7,000,000,000 for lend-lea~e.~~On the same day, committees repre-
senting the U.S. and British service staffs, which had been studying
jointly the best means of military collaboration if the United States
should join in the war, presented their first report (known as ABC-I)
on the grand strategy to be followed in a possible Anglo-American
war against the Axis.” T w o days later a second report, on air collabora-
tion, was submitted.100Known as ABC-2, this report recommended
that aircraft production be accelerated in both countries. As its first
objective, the United States should accomplish the AAF’s 54-group
program, with the view of employing a substantial portion of those
groups from England if America entered the war. The AAF should set
up as a further goal a program calling for roo groups, considered the
minimum requirement if the British Isles should be lost as a base for
our air forces. But it was also recommended that delivery of tactical
airplanes be made contingent upon the ability of the several services to
use them effectively and that therefore the AAF should defer the full
realization of its 54-group program to the extent that aircraft thus made
available could be used in the air offensive against Germany. Essen-
tially, this was an extension of the policy agreed on the previous July.
* See below, pp. 136-39.
1 3 0

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.