Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
devolved wholly upon units deployed in its immediate zone. Now
agreements with Great Britain made possible the construction of a
string of airfields in the Bahamas, Jamaica, Antigua, St. Lucia, Trini-
dad, and British Guiana, as well as on Puerto Rico. These promised
effective control of the approaches to the Caribbean, and hence to the
canal. The AAF was able also to expand existing facilities in the Canal
Zone and to prepare auxiliary fields in Central American republics.
Agreements with those countries brought about a progressive liberali-
zation of flight restrictions, which greatly simplified air operations in
defense of the Zone. Farther south, comparable arrangements were
made. In November 1941, U.S. forces occupied Surinam (Dutch
Guiana) . The move, made in co-operation with the Netherlands and
Brazilian governments, was designed to protect the invaluable bauxite
mines of Surinam, and here as in Greenland and Iceland, the United
States was pledged to withdraw at the termination of the international
cri~is.'~Now, with bases in both British and Dutch Guiana, the United
States was in position to move forces, spearheaded by heavy bom-
bardment units, to thwart any threatened Axis invasion of the exposed
angle of Brazil. All told, the new bases would constitute, when garri-
soned by fully equipped air units, an effective defense in depth of the
most vital positions toward our south.
Reinforcement of hemisphere defenses on the Pacific side reflected
both our comparatively late appreciation of the Japanese threat and
the immediate concern with the European Axis. Hence, in magnitude
and number, the measures taken to strengthen the Alaska-Hawaii-
Panama triangle were less impressive than like activities in the Atlantic-
Caribbean areas. As relations with Japan sharply deteriorated in 1941,
means were readily authorized for improving Pacific defenses. But
time was running out; few of the measures were complete when Japan
attacked and some were only on paper. Almost without exception, the
several specific improvements made in the area had long been urged by
the Air Corps. By 1940 valuable aid had been obtained from the Civil
Aeronautics Authority, but in many instances action was incited only
by the advent of war. Thus in view of the vulnerability of the western
approaches to the Panama Canal, the Air Corps throughout the re-
armament period had wished to secure rights to establish air bases on
COCOSIsland and the Galapagos Islands, from which long-range
aircraft could patrol far beyond the striking range of a carrier task
force. It was the current policy of the government, however, not to
124

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.