Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R 1 1
ward. But from an early date the Historical Office gave increasing
consideration to the definition of its ultimate objectives. Among these,
first place was given to the preparation of a comprehensive history of
the AAF’s war activities, to be written when victory would release
security controls. In the winter of 1943-44 the conviction was reached
that this history should not be conceived as the sum of the histories of
separate air forces and other major components bound only by the
physical format of a single work but rather as the story of our national
effort exerted through the Army air arm against determined foes in
widely scattered regions. It should be scholarly in tone, should be
addressed to those readers who have a serious interest in the study of
the air war, and should be of a length appropriate to the magnitude
and complexity of the subject but should not overlook certain human
limitations that presumably would govern both the author and the
reader. Such, at any rate, was the decision ultimately reached, and
seven volumes more or less arbitrarily came to be settled upon as a
practical compromise.
In intervals of relief from assignments of more immediate urgency
the office worked at an outline, which, though always tentative in
nature, began to take definite shape as the war in Europe drew to a
close. In September 1945 both the proposal and the suggesred outline
were approved in principle by the civilian Advisory Committee and
soon thereafter by the Air Staff. Since V-J Day the project, under the
weighty title of “The Seven Volume History,” had enjoyed a No. I
priority in the Historical Office. But there remained the practical
problem of translating the plans into actuality.
T h e importance of the story to be told and the wealth of archival
materials available suggested that a mature historian of outstanding
abilities be invited to undertake the task; informal caucusing for a
possible “Mahan of air power” became a favorite lunchtime occupa-
tion. But it was realized that, even in the unlikely event a distinguished
scholar could be lured from his own special interests, a seven-volume
history would constitute a lifetime assignment-the RAF’s history of
World W a r I, done in similar fashion and on a comparable scale, had
been finished only in 1937. It was eventually accepted that a seven-
volume work could be completed within a reasonable length of time
only as a co-operative venture. And it was not inappropriate that the
final product should bc a group enterprise. Inevitably the history must
bear the stamp of the field historians and of the legion of men who,
xv1

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.