Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A I R C O R P S P R E P A R E S F O R W A R , 1 9 3 9 - 4 1
armament in his message of 28 January 1938, it was in the interests
of “national defense,” a familiar In his comparable message
of 4 January 1939, he repeated the phrase but he also pledged “our
people and our resources” to the protection of the Western Hemi-
sphere and its common ideals.46This was only a reaffirmation of the
principles of the Monroe Doctrine, but the nature of the threats
against the Americas and the means of defense were rapidly changing.
Traditionally, military threats against the hemisphere had been con-
ceived in terms of a naval attack followed by an invasion by ground
forces. Against such dangers, the U.S. Navy had generally been con-
sidered our main bulwark, and since the inception of the Monroe
Doctrine we had enjoyed the tacit support of British seapower. Only
to the archisolationist did defense mean literally the repulse of an
enemy from our own shores. In January 1938, the President stressed
the need of keeping “any potential enemy many hundred miles away
from our continental limits.” 4 7 The war in Europe did little to allay
anxieties concerning an amphibious assault in force, and by the end
of June 1940 the danger seemed acute. The Nazis had overrun Poland,
Norway, Denmark, and the Low Countries; France had collapsed and
Italy had joined her Axis partner. The British Expeditionary Force,
broken as an effective army, had barely escaped from Dunkirk, and
the Atlantic coast from Narvik to Bordeaux was in the hands of the
Germans, who seemed poised for the assault on Britain. Gone was
American skepticism over the “sitzkrieg,” and our ideological sym-
pathy toward Britain was sharpened by concern for our own security.
It required not too much imagination to envisage a complete Axis vic-
tory in Europe which would a t best deny us the moral support of the
Royal Navy with its shipyards, and, at worst, place that fleet and
the French at the disposal of the Germans. Such additions to a com-
bination of Japanese, Italian, and German sea forces would have
imposed upon the U.S. Navy an impossible task. That the gravity of
the situation was widely appreciated in the United States was shown
not only by the wide publicity given to the threatened realignment
of ~ e a p o w e r , ~ ~but also by the celerity with which Congress sped
through additional appropriation bills to give us a “two-ocean navy.”
But there were, as well, threats of a new sort. The war in Europe,
with its co-ordination of military and political action, its emphasis
on surprise and speed, and its concentration of power against nodal
points had indicated that aggression against the western world might
“7

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.