Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 2 THE UNIVERSITYOF CHICAGOPRESS, CHICAGO8 LONDON The University of Toronto Press, Toronto 5, Canada Copyright 1948 by…
  • p. 48 …An Associated Press dispatch of 10 October gave a contemporary judgment of the importance of this…
  • p. 55 …Air Service (Corps) found it difficult to press vigorously for reorgani- zation and, by default, leadership…
  • p. 56 …In 1919the W a r Department was pressing for a drastic revision of the military establishment…
  • p. 61 …It held that there was no danger of an air attack on the United States and…
  • p. 64 …GHQ Air Forcq a trial than to press for more radical measures, and Howell’s group…
  • p. 75 …Powerful air attacks resolutely pressed home could never be completely stopped, but their effects could best…
  • p. 98 …based air operations in defense of the United States and its overseas posses~ions.’~T w…
  • p. 99 …General Westover’s report concluded that “all Air Force units could be concentrated on either coast…
  • p. 130 …the Admiralty began to press for control of naval air units, while the army attempted to…
  • p. 149 …basic and advanced Responsibility for crew and unit train- ing was vested in the GHQ Air…
  • p. 164 …A m y air units in the Territory existed primarily for the defense of this and…
  • p. 176 …no military alliances were made which would commit the United States to war; the plans only…
  • p. 278 …There were also grounds for hoping that heavy bomber units now based on Darwin might increase…
  • p. 285 …From 1938 the United States had invoked sanctions against Japan in the form of moral em…
  • p. 287 …Over-all Strategy and lmmediate Deployment On 2 2 December, the press announced dramatically the arrival…
  • p. 289 …ground units sent in that direction were not destined for immediate combat. No major invasion of…
  • p. 323 …Seizure of bases in Canada or Mexico for later attacks on the United States. Capture of…
  • p. 366 …United state^,^ and the British them- selves were forced to withdraw some pilots from combat units…
  • p. 380 …Upon the request of the Ferrying Command, the State Depart- ment again pressed for an answer…
  • p. 397 …the summer and fall, first as the United States Middle East Air Force and later as…
  • p. 430 …Attempts had been made to replace these obsolete craft by purchase from the United States, but…
  • p. 440 …But as the Japanese pressed forward the Americans were given no opportunity to get set. The…
  • p. 463 …personnel that would be reassigned to infantry units whose rosters already included many representatives of the…
  • p. 552 …pines and more recently of American air units operating in the Netherlands East Indies, he was…
  • p. 560 …Moreover, examination proved that most of the basic equipment of the units, including badly needed trucks…
  • p. 563 …Grady arrived from the United States for a comprehensive survey of Indian resources with reference to…
  • p. 564 …TO C H I N A graphic units, and unfavorable atmospheric conditions combined to make high…
  • p. 607 …Thus the AAF units engaged in the anti-U-boat war became almost a t once…
  • p. 628 …Army air bombardment units would operate offensively in collaboration with the Royal Air Force, primarily against…
  • p. 658 …was to operate in the United Kingdom.14' All air units initially based there were to…
  • p. 683 …of the units of the infant Eighth until their departure for the United Kingdom several months…
  • p. 691 …The RAF proposed that American fighter units be integrated with its own under a plan eventually…
  • p. 748 …533.) By 1928he was (Patrick, United States in the Air, pp. 190-91.) 38. Charges of…
  • p. 770 …y.W D Press Release, 2 1 June 1941. 9 1 . AR 95-5, 3a. 92…
  • p. 857 …Presque Isle, 344, 347-49, 641, 644-45 Press comment: B-17, 662-63; danger of…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
the movement of aircraft and fuel trucks an impediment to the con-
tractor's job. Both training and construction activities suffered from
the discomforts incident to new communities, as a field became alter-
nately a dust bowl or a morass with each change in Primi-
tive living conditions, makeshift classrooms, and overcrowded shops
remained characteristic of the whole of the prewar expansion period.
But construction, if rarely ahead of schedule, managed somehow to
meet increasing needs.
While the Air Corps was expanding it was undergoing, as well,
changes in organization and administrative structure. Inasmuch as the
organizational developments followed a somewhat circuitous course,
they sometimes tended to intensify, rather than assuage, the growing
pains of the Army air arm. T o the degree that these changes moved
toward greater autonomy, however, they did aid in simplifying com-
mand channels and delimiting responsibilities more sharply. T h e proc-
ess did not, in the period 1939-41, go far enough to satisfy those in
the Air Corps who had long desired independence; but as we drew
closer to war the air arm was able to assume an increasing share in
the determination of its own policies.
At the beginning of 1939, the Army air establishment still was or-
ganized into two correlative but independent elements," the Air Corps
and the GHQ Air Force-the one charged with materiel and training
functions, the other primarily with combat operations. With the
inauguration of the expansion program, the need for a closer co-
ordination and a centralized control became more pronounced, and
on I March 1939 the GHQ Air Force was placed under the Chief of
the Air Corps. T h e new relationship proved of short duration, for
on 19 November 1940 the GHQ Air Force was removed from the
jurisdiction of the Chief of the Air Corps and was accorded a separate
status under the commander of the Army field forces. T h e move was
opposed by most air leaders, since it precluded their ultimate com-
mand of the air striking force. T h e potentially serious effects of the
change were in some respects mitigated by the appointment a week
earlier of Maj. Gen. H.H. Arnold as Acting Deputy Chief of Staff.
Holding this office as well as that of Chief of the Air Corps, he was
in a position to co-ordinate the activities of the two elements of Army
a~iation.~'
By the spring of 1941, however, it was clear that co-ordination was
* See above, p. 3 2 .
1 I4

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.