Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 14 …with the commanding general, who in some instances moved in advance of promptings from Wash- ington…
  • p. 25 …EASTERNAND WESTERNAPPROACHESTO PANAMACANAL ALASKAAND THE ALEUTIANISLANDS PRINCIPALSEAAND AIR ROUTESAS DESIGNATEDBY WASH- ATLANTICFERRYINGAND TRANSPORTROUTESPRIORTO . . . . . . . . . . 297 30' 305…
  • p. 229 …the importance of the Far East Air Force in American strategy, the Air Staff in Wash…
  • p. 292 …Even so, there was in Wash- ington too little intelligence concerning the fluid tactical situation to…
  • p. 302 …The suggestion had been carried out in 1941 with the establishment of the U.S. Special…
  • p. 306 …work permanently with the British Joint Intelligence Committee in Wash- ington. The Combined Military Transportation Committee…
  • p. 389 …to delay the take-off was granted only after an appeal to Wash- ington.’O 3…
  • p. 442 …the time and attention of U.S. officers at Brisbane and of headquarters in Wash- ington…
  • p. 443 …Accidents delayed three planes en route, and one of the P-40’s was completely “washed…
  • p. 454 …promise of weakening the enemy. Attention already had been given in Wash- ington to establishment of…
  • p. 554 …In China, he found the procurement of necessary equipment, even be- fore the outbreak of war…
  • p. 636 …After further negotiations in Wash- ington, the Arnold-Towers-Portal agreement was adopted on z I…
  • p. 693 …Accordingly, Wash- ington was requested to send immediately 50 intelligence officers for training by the RAF…
  • p. 747 …before the Committee on Military Af- fairs, House of Representatives (Wash- 23. See, for instance, William…
  • p. 772 …The exact date of the arrival of air units is not known, as the latter source…
  • p. 799 …The road from Haiphong, Indo- China, to Yunnan was closed by the Vichy government in 1940…
  • p. 814 …Overseas (Ferrying), Air Min- istry, Memorandum on the Movement by Air of US. Forces to the…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
the movement of aircraft and fuel trucks an impediment to the con-
tractor's job. Both training and construction activities suffered from
the discomforts incident to new communities, as a field became alter-
nately a dust bowl or a morass with each change in Primi-
tive living conditions, makeshift classrooms, and overcrowded shops
remained characteristic of the whole of the prewar expansion period.
But construction, if rarely ahead of schedule, managed somehow to
meet increasing needs.
While the Air Corps was expanding it was undergoing, as well,
changes in organization and administrative structure. Inasmuch as the
organizational developments followed a somewhat circuitous course,
they sometimes tended to intensify, rather than assuage, the growing
pains of the Army air arm. T o the degree that these changes moved
toward greater autonomy, however, they did aid in simplifying com-
mand channels and delimiting responsibilities more sharply. T h e proc-
ess did not, in the period 1939-41, go far enough to satisfy those in
the Air Corps who had long desired independence; but as we drew
closer to war the air arm was able to assume an increasing share in
the determination of its own policies.
At the beginning of 1939, the Army air establishment still was or-
ganized into two correlative but independent elements," the Air Corps
and the GHQ Air Force-the one charged with materiel and training
functions, the other primarily with combat operations. With the
inauguration of the expansion program, the need for a closer co-
ordination and a centralized control became more pronounced, and
on I March 1939 the GHQ Air Force was placed under the Chief of
the Air Corps. T h e new relationship proved of short duration, for
on 19 November 1940 the GHQ Air Force was removed from the
jurisdiction of the Chief of the Air Corps and was accorded a separate
status under the commander of the Army field forces. T h e move was
opposed by most air leaders, since it precluded their ultimate com-
mand of the air striking force. T h e potentially serious effects of the
change were in some respects mitigated by the appointment a week
earlier of Maj. Gen. H.H. Arnold as Acting Deputy Chief of Staff.
Holding this office as well as that of Chief of the Air Corps, he was
in a position to co-ordinate the activities of the two elements of Army
a~iation.~'
By the spring of 1941, however, it was clear that co-ordination was
* See above, p. 3 2 .
1 I4

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.