Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
the movement of aircraft and fuel trucks an impediment to the con-
tractor's job. Both training and construction activities suffered from
the discomforts incident to new communities, as a field became alter-
nately a dust bowl or a morass with each change in Primi-
tive living conditions, makeshift classrooms, and overcrowded shops
remained characteristic of the whole of the prewar expansion period.
But construction, if rarely ahead of schedule, managed somehow to
meet increasing needs.
While the Air Corps was expanding it was undergoing, as well,
changes in organization and administrative structure. Inasmuch as the
organizational developments followed a somewhat circuitous course,
they sometimes tended to intensify, rather than assuage, the growing
pains of the Army air arm. T o the degree that these changes moved
toward greater autonomy, however, they did aid in simplifying com-
mand channels and delimiting responsibilities more sharply. T h e proc-
ess did not, in the period 1939-41, go far enough to satisfy those in
the Air Corps who had long desired independence; but as we drew
closer to war the air arm was able to assume an increasing share in
the determination of its own policies.
At the beginning of 1939, the Army air establishment still was or-
ganized into two correlative but independent elements," the Air Corps
and the GHQ Air Force-the one charged with materiel and training
functions, the other primarily with combat operations. With the
inauguration of the expansion program, the need for a closer co-
ordination and a centralized control became more pronounced, and
on I March 1939 the GHQ Air Force was placed under the Chief of
the Air Corps. T h e new relationship proved of short duration, for
on 19 November 1940 the GHQ Air Force was removed from the
jurisdiction of the Chief of the Air Corps and was accorded a separate
status under the commander of the Army field forces. T h e move was
opposed by most air leaders, since it precluded their ultimate com-
mand of the air striking force. T h e potentially serious effects of the
change were in some respects mitigated by the appointment a week
earlier of Maj. Gen. H.H. Arnold as Acting Deputy Chief of Staff.
Holding this office as well as that of Chief of the Air Corps, he was
in a position to co-ordinate the activities of the two elements of Army
a~iation.~'
By the spring of 1941, however, it was clear that co-ordination was
* See above, p. 3 2 .
1 I4

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.