Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
by that act was too short a period to justify any extended technical
training3
Civilian instructional facilities did not, of course, satisfy all the
needs of the Air Corps. Additional schools and readjustments in exist-
ing arrangements were provided under the general expansion program.
Training for individual flying specialties, which had been conducted
under the Air Corps Training Center at Randolph Field, Texas, was
expanded in July 1940 and placed under the direction of three flying
training “centers,” spaced geographically in areas enjoying the best
flying weather and each including a number, steadily growing, of
basic and advanced Responsibility for crew and unit train-
ing was vested in the GHQ Air Force and after June 1941 in its suc-
cessor, the Air Force Combat Command. The Technical Training
Command, with responsibility for all individual technical instruction,
was established in March 1941.’~
In all phases of the training program, courses of study were com-
pressed and pared down to the essentials. Curricula were made as
pragmatic as possible; there was no time for theoretical frills. In train-
ing, as in the development of aircraft, efforts were made to incor-
porate tactical lessons of the air war in Europe, which emphasized the
importance of formation flying at all altitudes, of accuracy in bomb-
ing and gunnery, and of the development of well-integrated combat
crews.36If in these respects the green crews of the early months of
the war did not always appear proficient, it was not for lack of ap-
preciation of the importance of this sort of training. Rather it
stemmed again from the lack of time, the shortage of instructors and
equipment-especially of planes. The shortage of trainers, acute at first,
was gradually overcome as factories concentrated first on their pro-
duction; but the very serious dearth of combat planes, in which alone
successful unit training could be carried out, lasted until long after
we were at war. Lacking equipment, the schools improvised; lacking
time, some adopted a 24-hour working day and a 7-day week. It was
not the sort of school life which would draw the nostalgic alumnus
back for a twenty-fifth reunion. But it got results.
The expansion of the Air Corps in materiel and in personnel re-
quired a comparable growth in its physical plant; new airfields were
needed for the training program, new depots for maintenance and
supply of the increasing number of planes, new bases for the tactical
units responsible for national defense. This aspect of expansion, like
I I2

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.