Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A I R C O R P S P R E P A R E S F O R W A R , 1 9 3 9 - 4 1
training men in such numbers-nor, for that matter, did it have the
experience. Its training program at the beginning of 1939 was based
on an annual graduating class of approximately 300 pilot^.'^ T o step
that up in three years to a rate of 50,000 pilots was as difficult a prob-
lem as increasing aircraft production from 2,000 to 50,000. Again
it meant the substitution of production-line techniques for handicraft
methods. But the United States was as inured to mass education as to
mass production.
T o build all the additional facilities required by the new objectives
would have required the outlay of vast sums; more pertinent to cur-
rent attitudes was the fact that it would have delayed the training
program by two precious years. Turning to civilian flying schools,
the Air Corps found a limited reservoir of instructors, aircraft, flying
fields, trained maintenance personnel, and experienced administrative
officials. Consideration of the possibility of using civilian training
facilities had begun in the fall of 1938;at that time there were twenty-
three privately owned flying schools which held zn approved rating
from the Civil Aeronautics Authority (CAA). In the spring of 1939
preparations were made for nine of the schools to provide primary
training for the Air Corps, though no contracts could be offered until
the middle of the year. The undertaking was frankly in the nature
of an experiment, but it proved eminently successful and gained
wider use as the Air Corps e~panded.~'Another source of potential
aid existed in a civilian pilot training program under the auspices of
the CAA. Authorized in mid- I 939 and later enlarged, this program
created a great reserve supply of pilots which could be tapped in a
serious national emergency. Graduates of this program could not, of
course, be rated as combat pilots without Air Corps training, but
many of them served as instructors in contract primary schools or
later as ferry pilots.31
In the training of ground crewmen, Air Corps facilities were also
supplemented by the use of civilian schools. At first only a few en-
listed men were sent to civilian mechanics schools, but the numbers
increased rapidly as the success of the experiment became a ~ p a r e n t . ~ '
By November 1941,the Air Corps had begun to train technicians, in
its own and in contract schools, at a rate calculated to turn out
IOO,OOO a year. Despite its great need for technicians, the Air Corps
at that time was not using men taken into the Army under the Selec-
tive Training and Service Act; the single year of service authorized
I 1 1

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.