Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
P-38 and P-47 were not to get into action until summer of 1942 and
spring of 1943, respectively. The listed planes were the ones, however,
with which we were to fight the first two years of the war. The only
important new-type aircraft were to come in late 1943 or 1944-the
P-51, first produced in quantity for the British, the A-36, the P-61,
the A-26, and the B-29. Of the models actually in use before Pearl
Harbor, tests and combat records seemed to indicate that as com-
pared to like foreign types, our heavy bombers were superior to our
medium and light bombers, while our light bombers were superior
to our fighters. In general those judgments were borne out by later
experience, though each of the planes underwent repeated improve-
ments on the basis of combat experience.
Personnel requirements grew with the increase in authorization for
aircraft. Intensive recruiting campaigns brought an influx of men as
permitted under the higher ceiling set by Congress in 1939. In mid-
1940, the Air Corps was authorized to procure flying cadets and
Reserve officers without limit during the fiscal year 1941, and relaxed
entrance requirements for cadets made possible the appointment of
large numbers for flying training. The President's order in August
1940 2 6 calling up the National Guard and Reserve forces resulted in
further increases in personnel. A still greater impetus to Air Corps
enlistment, from autumn 1940 until Pearl Harbor, came from the
Selective Service System program; even though procurement of pilots,
aircrew members, and technicians was still on a volunteer basis, the
prospect of compulsory service in an undesignated branch of the
Army proved a potent spur to Air Corps enlistment. Under these vari-
ous stimuli, the total number of Air Corps personnel jumped from
20,503 on I July 1939 to 152,569 just two years later, and the rate
of expansion was rapidly increasing when the United States went to
war.27
Pilot training goals were successively raised to keep pace with the
anticipated progress of other defense programs. From an objective
in 1939 calling for the training of 1 , 2 0 0 pilots a year, the figure was
raised in 1940 to 7,000, then to IZ,OOO, and by directive of February
1941 to 30,000. By the fall of that year, when the 84-group program
was under discussion, the AAF contemplated a training rate of 50,000
pilots a year by mid-1942.'~These goals called also for the training of
a proportionate number of other aircrew members and ground tech-
nicians. The Air Corps had neither the instructors nor facilities for
I I 0

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.