Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 2 THE UNIVERSITYOF CHICAGOPRESS, CHICAGO8 LONDON The University of Toronto Press, Toronto 5, Canada Copyright 1948 by…
  • p. 48 …An Associated Press dispatch of 10 October gave a contemporary judgment of the importance of this…
  • p. 55 …Air Service (Corps) found it difficult to press vigorously for reorgani- zation and, by default, leadership…
  • p. 56 …In 1919the W a r Department was pressing for a drastic revision of the military establishment…
  • p. 61 …It held that there was no danger of an air attack on the United States and…
  • p. 64 …GHQ Air Forcq a trial than to press for more radical measures, and Howell’s group…
  • p. 75 …Powerful air attacks resolutely pressed home could never be completely stopped, but their effects could best…
  • p. 98 …based air operations in defense of the United States and its overseas posses~ions.’~T w…
  • p. 99 …General Westover’s report concluded that “all Air Force units could be concentrated on either coast…
  • p. 130 …the Admiralty began to press for control of naval air units, while the army attempted to…
  • p. 149 …basic and advanced Responsibility for crew and unit train- ing was vested in the GHQ Air…
  • p. 164 …A m y air units in the Territory existed primarily for the defense of this and…
  • p. 176 …no military alliances were made which would commit the United States to war; the plans only…
  • p. 278 …There were also grounds for hoping that heavy bomber units now based on Darwin might increase…
  • p. 285 …From 1938 the United States had invoked sanctions against Japan in the form of moral em…
  • p. 287 …Over-all Strategy and lmmediate Deployment On 2 2 December, the press announced dramatically the arrival…
  • p. 289 …ground units sent in that direction were not destined for immediate combat. No major invasion of…
  • p. 323 …Seizure of bases in Canada or Mexico for later attacks on the United States. Capture of…
  • p. 366 …United state^,^ and the British them- selves were forced to withdraw some pilots from combat units…
  • p. 380 …Upon the request of the Ferrying Command, the State Depart- ment again pressed for an answer…
  • p. 397 …the summer and fall, first as the United States Middle East Air Force and later as…
  • p. 430 …Attempts had been made to replace these obsolete craft by purchase from the United States, but…
  • p. 440 …But as the Japanese pressed forward the Americans were given no opportunity to get set. The…
  • p. 463 …personnel that would be reassigned to infantry units whose rosters already included many representatives of the…
  • p. 552 …pines and more recently of American air units operating in the Netherlands East Indies, he was…
  • p. 560 …Moreover, examination proved that most of the basic equipment of the units, including badly needed trucks…
  • p. 563 …Grady arrived from the United States for a comprehensive survey of Indian resources with reference to…
  • p. 564 …TO C H I N A graphic units, and unfavorable atmospheric conditions combined to make high…
  • p. 607 …Thus the AAF units engaged in the anti-U-boat war became almost a t once…
  • p. 628 …Army air bombardment units would operate offensively in collaboration with the Royal Air Force, primarily against…
  • p. 658 …was to operate in the United Kingdom.14' All air units initially based there were to…
  • p. 683 …of the units of the infant Eighth until their departure for the United Kingdom several months…
  • p. 691 …The RAF proposed that American fighter units be integrated with its own under a plan eventually…
  • p. 748 …533.) By 1928he was (Patrick, United States in the Air, pp. 190-91.) 38. Charges of…
  • p. 770 …y.W D Press Release, 2 1 June 1941. 9 1 . AR 95-5, 3a. 92…
  • p. 857 …Presque Isle, 344, 347-49, 641, 644-45 Press comment: B-17, 662-63; danger of…
T H E A I R C O R P S P R E P A R E S F O R W A R , 1 9 3 9 - 4 1
and better protection against fire hazards. Hence in February 1940the
Air Corps completed plans for the installation of leak-proof tanks,
protective armor, and greater armament, even at the expense of speed
and useful load. A few months later Air Corps observers were sent to
France and England to study the air war at first hand, and their
recommendations led to further modernization of equipment.' ' In
May 1941, the W a r Department established the Special Observer
Group in London," and through its reports and those of occasional
special missions the Air Corps was kept constantly informed of the
latest materiel developments in England.'3 As a result of this informa-
tion as well as of the work of American scientists and engineers, there
was continued improvement in armament, signal communications,
safety devices, and other equipment.
When the United States entered the war, the Air Corps had in pro-
duction, in addition to other aircraft that would play no major part
in operations, the following tactical planes: 2 4
Air Corps In
Designa- Flight Produc-
T y p e tion Name Manufacturer Designed Test tion
Heavy Bomber B-17 Flying Boeing I934 '935 '936
B-24 Liberator Consolidated '937 '939 '940
Medium Bomber B-z5 Mitchell North American 1939 194' '94'
Light Bomber A-20 Havoc Douglas I939 '939 I940
66 " A-24 Dauntless Douglas (Navy SBD-3) 1941 1941
Pursuit P-38 Lightning Lockheed I937 '939 '940
P-39 Airacobra Bell '937 '939 1940
P-47 Thunderbolt Republic '940 '94' '94'
T h e term "in production" is misleading if taken in any but its tech-
nical sense. It has no necessary connotation of mass manufacture, but
means only that the plane had passed beyond the experimental and
test phases, and that the first number acceptable for tactical use had
rolled off the line. Thus whereas all the models mentioned above were
"in production," they represented various stages in combat readiness.
Some of them, notably the A-20 and P-40, had been tested in combat
by British crews.25 T h e B-26 was still an unknown quantity, but
experience indicated that in the B-17, B-24, and B-25 the AAF had
three bombers on which it could base its plans with confidence. T h e
Fortress
'6 ' I
" B-26 Marauder Martin '939 194' I941
' L
"
P-40 Kittyhawk Curtiss '937 I938 I940
* See below, pp. 577-99.
' 0 9

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.