Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 124 …role in accomplishing Hider’s plan of terri- torial aggrandizement. In March 1935 the Germans officially…
T H E A I R C O R P S P R E P A R E S F O R W A R , 1 9 3 9 - 4 1
Competitive bidding was supplemented by the more rapid procedure
of direct negotiation of contracts. In general the Air Corps profited
by its long and intimate association with the aircraft industry. Friendly
personal relations made for mutual confidence, and reliance upon a
telephone conversation or a quick airplane trip frequently obtained
results which would have required weeks of formal correspondence.
Some of the new methods were more expensive than the traditional
ones, but by 1940 the nation, though it is now easily forgotten, had
more money than time.
In some ways the Air Corps was able to exert a direct influence on
speeding up production. Standardization of aeronautical equipment
was one method. This subject had been under study by the Army arid
Navy for more than a decade. Joint efforts toward standardization
had begun with such minor items as nuts, bolts, and pressure pumps.
By the time rearmament began the Army and Navy were procuring
aircraft engines from two major contractors under terms which made
most models equally acceptable to either service. Further efforts were
made toward standardization of aircraft and related materiel used in
common by the US. and British services. Such a policy was advantage-
ous to both manufacturers and purchasers; it facilitated mass produc-
tion, lessened confusion for the producer, and reduced overhead costs.
Again, the Air Corps was able to reduce the long delays usually ex-
perienced in testing new models for acceptance. An accelerated serv-
ice-test procedure was instituted whereby experienced crews in
relays gave an airplane 1 5 0 hours of almost continuous flight with a
full military load. This system brought to light in one month defects
which formerly might have required a year of service testing for
discovery.16
These speed-up measures had begun with the initial appropriations
for Air Corps expansion and had been intensified as US. and British
demands increased. The 1939 Air Corps objective of 5,500 planes was
soon raised to 10,000.Then on 1 6 May 1940, with the extension of
the war in western Europe, the President called for an annual output
of 50,000 aircraft and a total Army and Navy strength of the same
number of planes; approved figures provided 36,500 for the Army,
I 3,500 for the Navy." T h e American aircraft industry was asked, in
essence, to expand from its normal capacity of some 2 , 0 0 0 planes a
year to more than 4,000 a month. Aircraft production in 1940 showed
an increase of 2 5 0 per cent over that of the previous year.18 T h e chief
'07

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.