Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A I R C O R P S P R E P A R E S F O R W A R , 1 9 3 9 - 4 1
United Stares evolved a dynamic, rather than a static, concept of de-
fense. The new concept was influenced by the military techniques of
the Nazis as well as by their unbroken string of victories. T h e pattern
of political infiltration, violent air attack, and machine-like blitzkrieg
encouraged the conviction that defense of the Western Hemisphere
was closely linked with the survival of the Allies, especially of Eng-
land: an Allied victory would forestall an Axis invasion of the Ameri-
cas and even by merely prolonging Allied resistance the United States
would gain time needed for building its defenses. So in 1940 aid to the
Allies had become the avowed policy of the American government.
This involved first the relaxation of neutrality restrictions, and it re-
quired a vast expansion of facilities for the production of munitions
in order that the United States might become “the arsenal of democ-
racy.” That expansion was rapid, but until the nation was forced into
a complete war economy production was never equal to the demands
of our own forces and of the Allies. Hence allocation of the limited
military supplies to the best interests of the nation became a problem
of singular difficulty and importance.
In extending lend-lease aid to Great Britain in March 1941 the
President declared the defense of that nation “vital to the defense of
the United States.” In this statement he merely followed a legislative
formula, but the phrase had a wider implication. If indeed our safety
was linked so closely with that of England, it was obvious that our
collaboration with that power might not stop short of war. In antici-
pation of that possibility, American and British military staffs were
active in 1941in shaping strategic plans to govern combined Anglo-
American operations should the United States be drawn into the war,
and the Army and Navy prepared more detailed joint plans for meet-
ing their respective responsibilities.
Preparations initiated by the United States government in the period
1939-41 involved, then, four interrelated activities: expansion of the
military establishment; development of a new doctrine of hemisphere
defense; aid to the Allies; and the formulation of strategic war plans.
T o an important degree the nature of those defense measures was
determined by the nature of the conflict in Europe. Thus in light of
the vital role played by the air arm in German offense and in British
defense, it was natural that the United States should place great empha-
sis on the development of air power. And hence during the period
1939-41the Air Corps figured prominently in each of the four aspects
1 0 3

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.