Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
other headquarters, and this was especially true of the overseas organi-
zations, where the chain of command normally ran from the command-
ing general of the local air force through theater headquarters to the
Chief of Staff, U. S. Army. The Historical Office could use its influ-
ence to secure from the War Department authorization of vacancies
for the job in tables of organization, it could offer its assistance in the
procurement of qualified personnel for the vacancies so established,
and it could make suggestions regarding desirable objectives and
standards. But the final choice remained with the commanding general,
who in some instances moved in advance of promptings from Wash-
ington to provide his own historical officer, and who in other instances
elected to fill the vacancies established by selection from his own staff.
In most cases, however, the offer of professional assistance from AAF
Headquarters was welcomed, though occasionally the official request
for such aid came late. The first historians selected by the Historical
Office for overseas service reached their stations only in late 1943, and
with most of them the time of arrival fell in 1944. Within the Zone of
the Interior, where the chain of command ran down from General
Arnold, the establishment of historical sections had proved to be a
less time-consuming effort. Even so, there were limits arising from the
old and generally sound principle of command that a superior gives
his subordinate a job to do but leaves it to him in large part to deter-
mine how best it can be done.
The finding of available personnel possessed of the desired qualifi-
cations was still another matter. Though civilians were heavily relied
upon in the Historical Office and at points elsewhere *inthe Zone of
the Interior, most of the key assignments required use of military
personnel. Opportunities for commissioning historians direct from
civilian life being limited and a t an early date entirely eliminated, it
was necessary to rely upon qualified personnel already in the Army;
and, since other branches had use for their own historians, the choice
actually came to be limited to the rosters of the AAF. Fortunately, a
considerable number of men possessed of advanced training in history
or closely related fields had volunteered at an early stage of the war
effort for service with the Army Air Forces, and they had played an
especially significant part in the development of the AAF training
program. As that program passed its peak in 1943, an increasing num-
ber of those men became available for reassignment to the historical
program. Being of military age, they were for the most part young
xiv

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.