Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 14 …with the commanding general, who in some instances moved in advance of promptings from Wash- ington…
  • p. 25 …EASTERNAND WESTERNAPPROACHESTO PANAMACANAL ALASKAAND THE ALEUTIANISLANDS PRINCIPALSEAAND AIR ROUTESAS DESIGNATEDBY WASH- ATLANTICFERRYINGAND TRANSPORTROUTESPRIORTO . . . . . . . . . . 297 30' 305…
  • p. 229 …the importance of the Far East Air Force in American strategy, the Air Staff in Wash…
  • p. 292 …Even so, there was in Wash- ington too little intelligence concerning the fluid tactical situation to…
  • p. 302 …The suggestion had been carried out in 1941 with the establishment of the U.S. Special…
  • p. 306 …work permanently with the British Joint Intelligence Committee in Wash- ington. The Combined Military Transportation Committee…
  • p. 389 …to delay the take-off was granted only after an appeal to Wash- ington.’O 3…
  • p. 442 …the time and attention of U.S. officers at Brisbane and of headquarters in Wash- ington…
  • p. 443 …Accidents delayed three planes en route, and one of the P-40’s was completely “washed…
  • p. 454 …promise of weakening the enemy. Attention already had been given in Wash- ington to establishment of…
  • p. 554 …In China, he found the procurement of necessary equipment, even be- fore the outbreak of war…
  • p. 636 …After further negotiations in Wash- ington, the Arnold-Towers-Portal agreement was adopted on z I…
  • p. 693 …Accordingly, Wash- ington was requested to send immediately 50 intelligence officers for training by the RAF…
  • p. 747 …before the Committee on Military Af- fairs, House of Representatives (Wash- 23. See, for instance, William…
  • p. 772 …The exact date of the arrival of air units is not known, as the latter source…
  • p. 799 …The road from Haiphong, Indo- China, to Yunnan was closed by the Vichy government in 1940…
  • p. 814 …Overseas (Ferrying), Air Min- istry, Memorandum on the Movement by Air of US. Forces to the…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
habit in respect to war had ever been first declare, then prepare. That
this policy had enjoyed the apparent sanction of success was not be-
cause of any virtue inherent in it. Actually our victories in foreign
wars owed much to three factors: the weakness of enemies like Mexico
and Spain; the involvement of enemies like England and Germany
with other European powers; and the geographical isolation of our
nation. In the period 1939-41these factors obtained, if at all, in a lesser
degree. Our potential enemies were strong, not weak; they were
girded for war materially and spiritually. The friendly powers upon
whom we might have depended for respite long shrank from war, and
when war came they crumbled one by one until only Britain stood,
and that precariously. And new techniques of war and new weapons-
particularly the long-range bomber and the carrier-borne plane-had
weakened the security once offered by our geographical situation.
Given these changed conditions and the revolutionary doctrines and
aggressive activities of the Axis powers, the United States could ill
afford its customary delay in preparing for war.
The national administration appreciated the new threat to our
security earlier than did most American citizens, but before Pearl
Harbor the public had, for the most part, come to recognize that
threat. This change in public opinion was in reality a psychological
preparation for war; it was brought about by the sheer logic of events
abroad and by the activities of private citizens, acting individually or
through organized groups, as well as by the educational efforts of the
national admini~tration.~Perhaps in the last analysis the psychological
preparation was the most important single factor in improving our
national defense, but this chapter is concerned only with more tangi-
ble measures inaugurated by the government.
When war broke out in Europe in September 1939, the United
States declared its n e ~ t r a l i t y . ~Its stated policy was to remain out of
the conflict if possible and a t the same time to keep the totalitarian
powers out of the Western Hemisphere. The latter objective de-
manded a further extension and an acceleration of previous programs
for strengthening American armed forces. It called also, because of
the threat of new weapons and modes of warfare, for the establish-
ment of new strategic bases. The declared policy was wholly con-
sonant with the Monroe Doctrine, and the measures taken to enforce
it were, for a while, consistent with our traditional ideas of defense.
But under the impact of repeated Axis successes in Europe, the
I02

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.