Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
had failed to achieve its objectives, and the aerial blitz was gradually
reduced to intermittent attacks which continued throughout the spring
of 1941. The Luftwaffe had sustained its first major defeat and
Britain had been saved, for an invasion was contingent first of all upon
defeat of the RAF.
It will take no credit from the RAF’s outnumbered “few” to sug-
gest that the Luftwaffe had been unprepared for the opportunity
offered in the summer of 1940. Except for a few raids against French
factories, the force had never been employed in a strategic effort of
its own. Trained and equipped for another mission, the Lufnvaffe
lacked a heavily armed long-range bomber capable of carrying large
bomb loads; * it tended to underestimate the bomb weight required
to accomplish its ends; its fighters were not only technically inferior
to the British but were at times misused; and faulty strategic planning
was reflected in a tendency to shift targets before the completion of
a sufficiently prolonged and concentrated effort.
The effect which the Battle of Britain had on subsequent planning
of the German and British air forces was both characteristic and
prophetic. True to their belief in the essentially tactical and support-
ing role of air power, the German army leaders felt that the results
of the Lufnvaffe’s independent effort over Britain vindicated their
position, and with this opinion Hitler seems to have agreed. No in-
sistent demand was made for new and improved types of aircraft, nor
was there any immediate program for increased plane production or
pilot training.35 Organizationally, the Luftwaff e continued to hold its
independent position among the German armed forces, but opera-
tionally it remained an auxiliary arm, For a time the German Air
Force intensified its operations against shipping in the eastern Atlantic
and in the Irish and North seas. The attempted air blockade achieved
a moderate degree of success, but the action of British fighter patrols
and the arming of merchant vessels by mid-1941 appeared to be in-
terfering considerably with Luftwaff e plans. Moreover, intensification
of German air activity on other fronts in 1941 resulted in withdrawal
of much of the Lufnvaffe strength from the west.
For some months, Axis operations in North Africa, the Mediter-
ranean, and eastern Europe received far more attention than did the
dwindling assault on the British Isles, and the Luftwaffe and the RAF
* Its four-engine FW-ZOO(military version of the Focke-Wulf Condor) was em-
ployed almost exclusively in antishipping patrol.
96

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.