Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
A I R W A R , 1 9 3 9 - 4 1
aircraft a month. For their bombing of England the Germans used
four main types of bombers: the Junkers 87, the Junkers 88, several
models of the Heinkel I I I , and the Dornier 17 (sometimes known as
the Dornier 2 I 5 ) , with fighter escort usually by Messerschmitt 109's
and I 10's. T h e entire strength of the Luftwaffe was not thrown into
the campaign at once. Qn 8 August the attacks began on a moderate
scale, and during the next ten days mass formations of German
bombers, accompanied by similar formations of fighters, made day-
light assaults on shipping and southern ports. T h e effective opposition
of Hurricanes and Spitfires, assisted by ground defenses, caused the
Germans to call a brief halt after 1 8 August, on which day they
sustained losses of seventy-one planes destroyed and twenty-three
damaged. For the period extending from 8 August to 2 3 August total
Luftwaffe losses were 403 destroyed and 1 2 7 damaged." In contrast
the RAF announced the loss of I 5 3 planes.
In the second phase of the campaign, from 24 August through 6
September, the Luftwaffe revised its tactics. Bomber formations were
reduced in size, while fighter escorts were increased. T h e attacks were
directed mainly against airdromes and aircraft factories instead of
shipping and harbors in an apparent attempt to knock out the RAF.
As in the first phase, German losses were so heavy that the direction
of the assault was again changed. T h e third phase, from 7 September
to I October, saw the peak of the German air effort, which was
directed toward industrial areas in general and London in particular.
By the end of September the RAF had asserred its control of the air
over rhe British Isles. During the third phase the British destroyed
435 planes and damaged 161, and total German losses since 10 July
now amounted to 1,408 planes destroyed. Unable to sustain such
losses, the Germans instituted still further changes in their tactics.
Nearly all the so-called long-range bombers were withdrawn, while
fighters and fighter-bombers continued the campaign with a decreasing
number of daylight attacks and an increasing number of attacks at
night. London was still the principal target, and the British suffered
heavy casualties and extensive material damage, particularly during
the night assaults when their fighter protection was not so effective
as it was during the hours of daylight. Nevertheless, the Luftwaffe
* These are the revised figures, based on German records, announced in May 1947
by Mr. Philip Noel-Baker, British Secretary of State for Air (See Flight and Aircraft
Engineer [London], 22 May 1947, p. 482, for complete table.)
95

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.