Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
factories” were ready to go into production to supplement the exist-
ing aircraft industry. At the moment the British did not possess the
means to carry out a strategic offensive against Germany, but it was
hoped that the badly ournumbered RAF would be able to hold off
any German air assault until its own offensive could be inaugurated.
The initial burden of the air war with Germany therefore fell to the
Fighter Command.
During late 1939 and early 1940, German air action against Britain
consisted largely of mine-laying operations to the east of the British
Isles, while the RAF carried pamphlets instead of bombs to Germany.
An air contingent had gone to France with the British Expeditionary
Force, but with the exception of the action at Dunkirk, the per-
formance of the RAF on the continent gave outsiders little suggestion
of its real caliber. Conclusive proof of its technical superiority and
of its staying power awaited the Battle of Britain-a contest fought
wholly in the air and one of the truly decisive battles of history.
By the summer of 1940 the breath-taking advance of German
forces had destroyed all effective resistance in France and seemingly
presented to the Nazis an inviting opportunity to establish beyond
question their control of all western Europe by invasion of an ill-
prepared Britain. In fact, the Germans were less well prepared to
seize the opportunity that lay before them than were the British
to fend off such attacks as came. Though the Luftwaffe urged an im-
mediate invasion, its commanders could not promise security for
supply lines across the English Channel against the Royal Navy. The
German navy was unable to provide such a guarantee, and, moreover,
it lacked necessary equipment for moving an invading force across
the intervening waters. The army itself, caught unprepared, required
time for preparation and was reluctant to move without more ade-
quate assurance from naval and air force^.^' Immediate invasion ap-
pearing therefore to be inadvisable, the Germans decided to use the
Luftwaffe as a strategic air force against the British Isles, with the
hope that Britain would surrender or that at least an invasion would
be made less difficult.
Preliminary to the battle, the Germans made sporadic raids during
July and the first week of August 1940 in order to feel out British
defenses.34 The Luftwaffe by this time was equipped with 1,100
fighters and 840 bombers in operational condition, and the German
aircraft industry continued to turn out approximately 500 combat
94

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.