Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
F O R E W O R D
final form and production of which the Sources and Editorial Branch
also assumed responsibility, approximately ninety had been completed
by the summer of 1946. And since that time the Office of Air Force
History has continued to prepare, under the direction of Dr. Albert F.
Simpson as Air Force Historian, narratives and monographs designed
ultimately to round out the many-sided story of the AAF.
During the later stages of the war the Historical Office enjoyed
the assistance of a special advisory committee, consisting of Professors
Richard A. Newhall of Williams College (chairman), Joseph R.
Strayer of Princeton University, and John A. Krout of Columbia
University. This committee offered helpful advice and counsel that
proved to be of special value in the planning of this history.
Any brief account of the sort here attempted unavoidably reduces
the problem to simpler terms than it actually presented to those who
first faced it. The task was a new one and had to be undertaken with-
out the benefit of any established tradition either in the Army Air
Forces or in the other armed services as to the kind of history desired;
necessarily the job was learned in the doing of it. Necessarily, too, the
project was carried forward with by no means the highest priority
in the hurried atmosphere of a military headquarters, and it depended
for its support upon men who had a war to win before they could
devote much time to the recording of it. The degree of interest shown
naturally tended to vary as between one commanding general and
another, a difference inevitably reflected in the accomplishments of
the historical officer, but fortunately the Air Staff in Washington set
for other commands a most helpful standard of policy. T w o principles
received its consistent support throughout the war: ( I ) that the job
should be intrusted only to professionally qualified personnel and ( 2 )
that this personnel should have full access to all AAF records neces-
sary to the accomplishment of its task. The historian was thus given a
challenging opportunity, and in return he welcomed the increasing
number of instances in which he had occasion to demonstrate the
practical value of a well-ordered historical record to the immediate
needs of the staff.
The procurement and assignment of qualified personnel was in
itself a problem of no mean proportions. In keeping with established
military usage, the preparation of each command’s history became a
command responsibility. The AAF Historical Office was limited,
therefore, in the control it could exercise over historical activity in
...Xlll

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.