Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
that German air power was invincible; indeed, the very name in-
spired dread and fear, as the Germans had intended it should. But the
triumphs of 1939 and early 1940 had all been scored against weak
opposition, and there were limitations to German strength which
time would increasingly reveal. Satisfied with the performance of
their aircraft for the purposes in mind, leaders of the Luftwaffe had
put various models into early mass production; the emphasis tended
to be placed on numerical strength rather than on technical superi-
ority. At points, perhaps too much faith had been placed in speed at
the cost of armament. The Luftwaffe, moreover, seems to have been
lulled into a false sense of security by its early successes. Though its
commanders explained the British escape at Dunkirk by pointing to
the unfavorable weather and a failure of supply resulting from the
speed of the German advance, the success of the RAF at Dunkirk
indicated that British aircraft possessed technical advantages that in
all-out combat might prove decisive. That test soon came in the
Battle of Britain.
T h e RAF and the Battle of Britain
The German bombing of Britain in World War I1 was not unex-
pected by the British, nor was it without precedent. During the con-
flict of 1914-18,the Germans had made 5 2 air raids against the British
Isles, dropping 7 3 tons of bombs which killed 857 persons and injured
2,058. These raids helped to bring the Royal Air Force into existence
as an autonomous force, for the enemy's action had pointed up the
weakness of British air defenses and the desirability of carrying the
air war to the German homeland. At the same time, British leaders
in search of a strategy that would break the long and exhausting stale-
mate on the western front had by 1918 assigned to the air force an
independent mission of strategic bombing. Accordingly, in March
1918 the air forces, theretofore divided between the army and navy,
were unified in the Royal Air Force as a third and co-ordinate branch
of the armed services, under the administrative control of the Air
Ministry. Termination of hostilities that autumn did not permit the
full development and execution of plans for a strategic offensive
against Germany," but, unlike the American Air Service, the RAF
emerged from World War I with its independent mission and sepa-
rate organization officially re~ognized.~'
* See above, pp. 1 5 , 37.
92

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.