Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
A I R W A R , 1 9 3 9 - 4 1
within ten years, and with frequent changes in the chief of staff,
French aviation had little opportunity to develop in accordance with
a definite, long-range program.
Until mid-1934 French army aviation, which like the German was
used chiefly for army co-operation, was under the jurisdiction of the
War Ministry, while naval aviation was controlled by the Ministry
of Marine. In July 1934, the ArmCe de 1’Air (French Air Force)
was established by government decree as “an independent army
capable of participating, on the one hand, in aerial operations and in
the air defense of territory and, on the other hand, in combined
operations with the land and sea forces.” In keeping with French
military traditions, however, the air force remained closely attached
to the army. T h e reorganization of 1934 did not affect commercial
or naval aviation. T w o years later another reorganization assured the
French Air Force of autonomy, if not complete independence. In
order that command of air units might be separated from command
of territorial units, a decree of September 1936 established a unified
command for all air units other than naval. T h e aircraft industry was
nationalized a t about this time, and a subsequent slump in production
saw the output of military airplanes reduced within less than two
years to the negligible rate of ten planes per month. By this time the
combat efficiency, organization, morale, and equipment of the French
Air Force had dropped to an unprecedented low.
Hurried attempts to rebuild the French Air Force were made after
the Munich conference in 1938. Both local production and foreign
purchases of aircraft were increased, but the revival came too late.
France entered World W a r I1 with an air force which was deficient
in every respect. Besides the low level of morale which characterized
all the French forces, the air force did not have a sufficient number
of bombers for offensive action, and it lacked sufficient fighter
strength for defense against the Germans. Ground troops did not
have adequate air support, while the lack of liaison and reconnais-
sance aircraft constituted a further deficiency. If any thought had
been given to the use of the French Air Force as a strategic weapon,
it had failed to materialize. The weaknesses of the French Air Force
contributed substantially to the success of the Luftwaff e in the spring
of 1940. After French surrender on 2 2 June, only the RAF remained
for the Luftwaffe to conquer.
The success of the Luftwaffe up to this point seemed to indicate
91

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.