Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
A I R W A R , 1 9 3 9 - 4 1
highly publicized dive bomber or Stuka. Goering had successfully
opposed the navy's desire for its own separate air arm, and the Luft-
waff e held responsibility for coastal patrol, overwater reconnaissance,
and other activities in conjunction with naval forces.
In the same month that Hitler issued decrees effecting the reorgani-
zation of the Luftwaffe, he asserted that the Reich would expand to
include ten million Germans beyond her borders. Within one month
Austria had become the first victim of Nazi aggression. During their
occupation of Austria the Germans used approximately 400 aircraft,
more than one-fourth of the number being transport aircraft which
brought 2 , 0 0 0 soldiers to Vienna. The Luftwaffe soon absorbed the
small Austrian Air Force and was again employed by Hitler in Sep-
tember 1938 when some 5 0 0 German aircraft assisted in the invasion
of the Sudetenland. A year later the might of the Luftwaffe was
released in open warfare. By that time, September 1939, the German
Air Force was equipped with approximately 4,000 first-line aircraft,
of which some 1,800 were bombers and 1,200 were fighters. Behind
it stood an aircraft industry then capable of producing approximately
1,100aircraft a month, but actually producing each month about 500
aircraft of all combat types.28Clearly, it was not anticipated that the
venture now about to be launched would involve too heavy a commit-
ment. In its internal organization the Luftwaffe seemed to have
achieved most of its objectives, and it was ready to prove its worth as a
co-ordinate member of the Wehrmacht.
On I September 1939 the Lufnvaffe and German army forces
inaugurated a lightning-like campaign which saw the virtual annihila-
tion of the Polish army within twenty days. The German Air Force,
which had 1,000bombers and 1,050 fighters in operational condition,
met no effective opposition from the Polish Air Force, which con-
sisted of less than 500 planes of all types, most of them obsolescent.
The Lufnvaffe was used both to eliminate the air opposition and as
an advance striking force for the army. So successful was the Polish
campaign that the Germans saw no need for major change. Army
commanders felt that the results justified their conception of the air
force as a tactical weapon to be used primarily in support of the
ground forces, while Luftwaffe chiefs took satisfaction in the per-
formance of their fighters and dive bombers. There was no demand
for the creation of new types of aircraft or for an increase in aircraft
p r o d u c t i ~ n . ~ ~
89

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.