Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 2 THE UNIVERSITYOF CHICAGOPRESS, CHICAGO8 LONDON The University of Toronto Press, Toronto 5, Canada Copyright 1948 by…
  • p. 48 …An Associated Press dispatch of 10 October gave a contemporary judgment of the importance of this…
  • p. 55 …Air Service (Corps) found it difficult to press vigorously for reorgani- zation and, by default, leadership…
  • p. 56 …In 1919the W a r Department was pressing for a drastic revision of the military establishment…
  • p. 61 …It held that there was no danger of an air attack on the United States and…
  • p. 64 …GHQ Air Forcq a trial than to press for more radical measures, and Howell’s group…
  • p. 75 …Powerful air attacks resolutely pressed home could never be completely stopped, but their effects could best…
  • p. 98 …based air operations in defense of the United States and its overseas posses~ions.’~T w…
  • p. 99 …General Westover’s report concluded that “all Air Force units could be concentrated on either coast…
  • p. 130 …the Admiralty began to press for control of naval air units, while the army attempted to…
  • p. 149 …basic and advanced Responsibility for crew and unit train- ing was vested in the GHQ Air…
  • p. 164 …A m y air units in the Territory existed primarily for the defense of this and…
  • p. 176 …no military alliances were made which would commit the United States to war; the plans only…
  • p. 278 …There were also grounds for hoping that heavy bomber units now based on Darwin might increase…
  • p. 285 …From 1938 the United States had invoked sanctions against Japan in the form of moral em…
  • p. 287 …Over-all Strategy and lmmediate Deployment On 2 2 December, the press announced dramatically the arrival…
  • p. 289 …ground units sent in that direction were not destined for immediate combat. No major invasion of…
  • p. 323 …Seizure of bases in Canada or Mexico for later attacks on the United States. Capture of…
  • p. 366 …United state^,^ and the British them- selves were forced to withdraw some pilots from combat units…
  • p. 380 …Upon the request of the Ferrying Command, the State Depart- ment again pressed for an answer…
  • p. 397 …the summer and fall, first as the United States Middle East Air Force and later as…
  • p. 430 …Attempts had been made to replace these obsolete craft by purchase from the United States, but…
  • p. 440 …But as the Japanese pressed forward the Americans were given no opportunity to get set. The…
  • p. 463 …personnel that would be reassigned to infantry units whose rosters already included many representatives of the…
  • p. 552 …pines and more recently of American air units operating in the Netherlands East Indies, he was…
  • p. 560 …Moreover, examination proved that most of the basic equipment of the units, including badly needed trucks…
  • p. 563 …Grady arrived from the United States for a comprehensive survey of Indian resources with reference to…
  • p. 564 …TO C H I N A graphic units, and unfavorable atmospheric conditions combined to make high…
  • p. 607 …Thus the AAF units engaged in the anti-U-boat war became almost a t once…
  • p. 628 …Army air bombardment units would operate offensively in collaboration with the Royal Air Force, primarily against…
  • p. 658 …was to operate in the United Kingdom.14' All air units initially based there were to…
  • p. 683 …of the units of the infant Eighth until their departure for the United Kingdom several months…
  • p. 691 …The RAF proposed that American fighter units be integrated with its own under a plan eventually…
  • p. 748 …533.) By 1928he was (Patrick, United States in the Air, pp. 190-91.) 38. Charges of…
  • p. 770 …y.W D Press Release, 2 1 June 1941. 9 1 . AR 95-5, 3a. 92…
  • p. 857 …Presque Isle, 344, 347-49, 641, 644-45 Press comment: B-17, 662-63; danger of…
A I R W A R , 1939-41
approximately 1 , 2 0 0 aircraft. The Italian Air Force clearly had not
been prepared for the defensive war which it was forced to fight.
Although the efficiency of the force thereafter increased slightly
under the stimulus of its working partner, the German Air Force, the
Regia Aeronautica never exhibited sufficient power to be decisive in
the outcome of prolonged hostilities. The fundamental weakness of
the Italian Air Force was not in its theory of air power, which later
events proved to be essentially sound, but rather in its inability to
make proper application of that theory.“
The German Air Force
Germany possessed by far the most formidable air force of the three
totalitarian nations. Following World War I, German aviation had
been virtually abolished by the Treaty of Versailles. Determined to
rebuild their military aviation, however, the Germans found ways of
circumventing and then openly violating the terms of the Versailles
agreement.18 Since the treaty had not prohibited German manufac-
ture of commercial aircraft except for a brief period of six months, the
German aircraft industry soon began to revive. In 1922 and again in
1924limitations were placed on the number of civil aircraft which the
Germans might manufacture, and representatives of the allied nations
also laid down more specific rules defining the term “military aircraft”
as used in the Treaty of Versailles. These restrictions had little effect,
for German aircraft manufacturers promptly established subsidiary
companies in neutral countries, where the production of aircraft could
proceed without regard to limitations. Factories were built by Junkers
in Russia, Sweden, and Turkey, by Rohrback in Denmark, by Heinkel
in Sweden, and by Dornier in Italy and Switzerland. The lid was
officially removed in May 1926, when the Paris Air Agreement with-
drew all limitations on the number and size of commercial aircraft
which Germany might build, though the bans on military aviation and
on the subsidization of sporting aviation remained.lg
It was therefore under the guise of commercial aviation that the
German Air Force began its recovery. T h e German Republic estab-
lished a ministry of transport with an aviation department which had
authority over all civilian aeronautics. Headed by a former officer of
the German Air Force, the aviation department sought to promote the
growth of “civilian” airlines, the advancement of aeronautical science,
and the development of interest in aviation among the German people.
85

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.