Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 14 …with the commanding general, who in some instances moved in advance of promptings from Wash- ington…
  • p. 25 …EASTERNAND WESTERNAPPROACHESTO PANAMACANAL ALASKAAND THE ALEUTIANISLANDS PRINCIPALSEAAND AIR ROUTESAS DESIGNATEDBY WASH- ATLANTICFERRYINGAND TRANSPORTROUTESPRIORTO . . . . . . . . . . 297 30' 305…
  • p. 229 …the importance of the Far East Air Force in American strategy, the Air Staff in Wash…
  • p. 292 …Even so, there was in Wash- ington too little intelligence concerning the fluid tactical situation to…
  • p. 302 …The suggestion had been carried out in 1941 with the establishment of the U.S. Special…
  • p. 306 …work permanently with the British Joint Intelligence Committee in Wash- ington. The Combined Military Transportation Committee…
  • p. 389 …to delay the take-off was granted only after an appeal to Wash- ington.’O 3…
  • p. 442 …the time and attention of U.S. officers at Brisbane and of headquarters in Wash- ington…
  • p. 443 …Accidents delayed three planes en route, and one of the P-40’s was completely “washed…
  • p. 454 …promise of weakening the enemy. Attention already had been given in Wash- ington to establishment of…
  • p. 554 …In China, he found the procurement of necessary equipment, even be- fore the outbreak of war…
  • p. 636 …After further negotiations in Wash- ington, the Arnold-Towers-Portal agreement was adopted on z I…
  • p. 693 …Accordingly, Wash- ington was requested to send immediately 50 intelligence officers for training by the RAF…
  • p. 747 …before the Committee on Military Af- fairs, House of Representatives (Wash- 23. See, for instance, William…
  • p. 772 …The exact date of the arrival of air units is not known, as the latter source…
  • p. 799 …The road from Haiphong, Indo- China, to Yunnan was closed by the Vichy government in 1940…
  • p. 814 …Overseas (Ferrying), Air Min- istry, Memorandum on the Movement by Air of US. Forces to the…
A I R W A R , 1939-41
approximately 1 , 2 0 0 aircraft. The Italian Air Force clearly had not
been prepared for the defensive war which it was forced to fight.
Although the efficiency of the force thereafter increased slightly
under the stimulus of its working partner, the German Air Force, the
Regia Aeronautica never exhibited sufficient power to be decisive in
the outcome of prolonged hostilities. The fundamental weakness of
the Italian Air Force was not in its theory of air power, which later
events proved to be essentially sound, but rather in its inability to
make proper application of that theory.“
The German Air Force
Germany possessed by far the most formidable air force of the three
totalitarian nations. Following World War I, German aviation had
been virtually abolished by the Treaty of Versailles. Determined to
rebuild their military aviation, however, the Germans found ways of
circumventing and then openly violating the terms of the Versailles
agreement.18 Since the treaty had not prohibited German manufac-
ture of commercial aircraft except for a brief period of six months, the
German aircraft industry soon began to revive. In 1922 and again in
1924limitations were placed on the number of civil aircraft which the
Germans might manufacture, and representatives of the allied nations
also laid down more specific rules defining the term “military aircraft”
as used in the Treaty of Versailles. These restrictions had little effect,
for German aircraft manufacturers promptly established subsidiary
companies in neutral countries, where the production of aircraft could
proceed without regard to limitations. Factories were built by Junkers
in Russia, Sweden, and Turkey, by Rohrback in Denmark, by Heinkel
in Sweden, and by Dornier in Italy and Switzerland. The lid was
officially removed in May 1926, when the Paris Air Agreement with-
drew all limitations on the number and size of commercial aircraft
which Germany might build, though the bans on military aviation and
on the subsidization of sporting aviation remained.lg
It was therefore under the guise of commercial aviation that the
German Air Force began its recovery. T h e German Republic estab-
lished a ministry of transport with an aviation department which had
authority over all civilian aeronautics. Headed by a former officer of
the German Air Force, the aviation department sought to promote the
growth of “civilian” airlines, the advancement of aeronautical science,
and the development of interest in aviation among the German people.
85

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.