Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
A I R W A R , 1939-41
approximately 1 , 2 0 0 aircraft. The Italian Air Force clearly had not
been prepared for the defensive war which it was forced to fight.
Although the efficiency of the force thereafter increased slightly
under the stimulus of its working partner, the German Air Force, the
Regia Aeronautica never exhibited sufficient power to be decisive in
the outcome of prolonged hostilities. The fundamental weakness of
the Italian Air Force was not in its theory of air power, which later
events proved to be essentially sound, but rather in its inability to
make proper application of that theory.“
The German Air Force
Germany possessed by far the most formidable air force of the three
totalitarian nations. Following World War I, German aviation had
been virtually abolished by the Treaty of Versailles. Determined to
rebuild their military aviation, however, the Germans found ways of
circumventing and then openly violating the terms of the Versailles
agreement.18 Since the treaty had not prohibited German manufac-
ture of commercial aircraft except for a brief period of six months, the
German aircraft industry soon began to revive. In 1922 and again in
1924limitations were placed on the number of civil aircraft which the
Germans might manufacture, and representatives of the allied nations
also laid down more specific rules defining the term “military aircraft”
as used in the Treaty of Versailles. These restrictions had little effect,
for German aircraft manufacturers promptly established subsidiary
companies in neutral countries, where the production of aircraft could
proceed without regard to limitations. Factories were built by Junkers
in Russia, Sweden, and Turkey, by Rohrback in Denmark, by Heinkel
in Sweden, and by Dornier in Italy and Switzerland. The lid was
officially removed in May 1926, when the Paris Air Agreement with-
drew all limitations on the number and size of commercial aircraft
which Germany might build, though the bans on military aviation and
on the subsidization of sporting aviation remained.lg
It was therefore under the guise of commercial aviation that the
German Air Force began its recovery. T h e German Republic estab-
lished a ministry of transport with an aviation department which had
authority over all civilian aeronautics. Headed by a former officer of
the German Air Force, the aviation department sought to promote the
growth of “civilian” airlines, the advancement of aeronautical science,
and the development of interest in aviation among the German people.
85

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.