Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
celona, where port facilities capable of handling as much traffic in one
day as all the other Catalonian ports in ten days had been paralyzed,
according to him, in a systematic offensive carried out by thirty
bombers over a period of several months. But when all is said, there
would appear to be more reason for regarding the Nationalist victory
as an indication of the weakness of Loyalist forces than as proof of the
tactical and technical soundness of the Italian Air Force.15
The U.S. Army Air Corps, at least, saw nothing in the aerial war-
fare in Spain or in China to suggest the advisability of change in its
own doctrines. In both conflicts the combatants employed relatively
small numbers of aircraft, and the bomber appeared to be regarded
chiefly as a means of intensifying artillery fire and of increasing its
range. In the few instances of strategic bombing, the number of planes
employed was so small as to preclude the possibility of really signifi-
cant results. As for the matter of individual technique, little emerged
from the fighting in Spain or in China that was not already known as
a result of the aerial activity of World War I.I6 The Italian Air Force,
closely watched by air strategists in the United States and elsewhere,
again had failed either to prove or to disprove the doctrines of Douhet.
When Italy entered World War I1 in June 1940, just a few days
prior to the collapse of France, Mussolini hoped that the Regia Aero-
nautica with its approximately 2,600 first-line aircraft would prove a
dominating factor in control of the Mediterranean. The hope was not
fulfilled, for numerous weaknesses in the Italian Air Force rapidly
came to light, and the force began its descent from the fairly respect-
able reputation which it had held among the air forces of the leading
world powers. Italy’s aircraft industry was unequal to the demands of
large-scale warfare; production of combat types never exceeded 300
aircraft a month. The pattern of air force organization proved to be
unstable and unwieldy in widespread operations. Training and morale
were on a low level, and the temperament of the Italian airman tended
to stress individual exploits rather than accomplishments of the group.
Much of the equipment of the air force was obsolescent, while poor
maintenance kept many of the planes on the ground. A great portion
of the strength of the Regia Aeronautica was committed to the fight-
ing in Africa, where the Italians attempted in vain to rout the British
from their positions in the northern part of the continent. Initial Italian
successes in the campaign were soon followed by the disintegration
of Italian East Africa, and in the first retreat in Libya the Italians lost
84

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.