Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
A I R W A R , 1939-41
short, swift war, the victory to be achieved largely through the para-
lyzing effect of strategic bombardment.’* In the matter of organization,
Douhet advocated the establishment of the air forces as a separate arm
and the co-ordination of air, army, and navy forces through a depart-
ment of national defense. This last part of the Douhet doctrine was
closely followed by the Italians, for after the establishment of the Air
Ministry all Italian forces were reorganized and Marshal Pietro Badog-
lio becarne chief of staff of the United Armed F 0 r ~ e s . l ~But, when the
test came, the Regia Aeronautica proved itself incapable of carrying
OUK either a short or a long war against any reasonably determined
opposition.
In its first “combat” test during the thirties the Italian Air Force
faced no real opposition. In the war against Ethiopia, 1935-36, Italian
bombers gained experience in the use of various types of projectiles,
and experiments were conducted in dropping ammunition, food, and
water to the Italian ground forces; even fresh meat was supplied for
the troops by the dropping of live goats and sheep which parachuted
to the desert and took up the march with the army until they were
needed for food. Most of the planes used were obsolete, though the
few Savoia-Marchetti bombers employed were of latest models. But
in a country as primitive as Ethiopia there could be no chance to test
Douhet’s theory of strategic bombardment; the air force was employed
almost exclusively in giving close support to Italian ground f 0 r ~ e s . l ~
A more thorough test of Italian air materiel and doctrine was pro-
vided by participation, beginning in 1936, in the Spanish civil war.
Again the opposition was slight. Russia, as well as Germany and Italy,
took an active part in the contest, but Soviet assistance to the Loyalists
was limited, and the few obsolete aircraft which the Republicans
acquired from France were quickly shot down or wrecked. T h e bomb-
ing by both factions in the conflict was largely tactical, although the
Italians claimed to have accomplished a considerable amount of eff ec-
tive strategic bombing. Italian air units, based on the Balearic Islands,
Sardinia, and the mainland of Italy, at times operated as an independent
force against cities and harbors; and the bombing, performed at
heights ranging from 16,000 to 2 0 , 0 0 0 feet, was reported by the
Italians to be “remarkably accurate.” According to Gen. Giuseppe
Valle, addressing the Chamber of Fasci and Corporations on 5 May
1939, the war in Spain had demonstrated “the importance of the air
arm in independent strategic action.” H e pointed to the case of Bar-
83

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.