Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
F O R E W O R D
time. T h e job had to be accomplished within the limits of an indeter-
minate number of months or years. No one could predict the actual
duration of the war, but it was clear that at its end, or soon thereafter,
the historian must be prepared to bring to a close at least the prelimi-
nary selection and arrangement of his materials. It was hoped, to be
sure, that he would have an opportunity after the termination of hos-
tilities for more intensive study. But there was no escape from the
practical necessity of distinguishing between a war and a postwar
phase of the effort, and unavoidably the emphasis during that first
phase fell on the selection and collection of the materials themselves.
It being difficult to lay down principles of selection that were uni-
versally applicable, the decision was made to rely principally on the
judgment of professionally trained historians strategically placed at
key points of command. T h e first of those points, of course, was AAF
Headquarters itself. Though the Army Air Forces legally was no
more than a training and service organization operating within the
limits of this country, its headquarters, as will be demonstrated later,
was actually the nerve center controlling in large measure the entire
war effort in the air. And so, personnel of the Historical Office under-
took, each historian working in his own area of specialization and by
research initially in Headquarters files, to draw together as comprehen-
sive a record of the air effort as was physically possible within the
time limits operating and, while condensing this record into some
readily usable form, to treat it with a breadth of view appropriate to
the highest echelon of command. At the same time, and for the pur-
pose of supplementing Headquarters files with a selection from records
of action available only in the area of that action, an attempt was made
to secure the assignment of qualified historical personnel to the head-
quarters staff of each air force and command. T h e responsibility of the
historian so assigned was twofold: to act, first, as the historian of his
command for the purpose of recording its activities from the point of
view of its own headquarters and, second, to provide such professional
guidance as he could for those officers and enlisted men of the various
units comprising the command who, in addition to their other duties,
were charged with the preparation of the unit history. T h e unit his-
tory had long been required by Army regulations, and the effort of
the Historical Office in that particular was directed chiefly to the
establishment of standards that would lend to it greater historical
value. Thus the policy became essentially that of placing profession-
xi

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.