The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

T H E A R M Y A I R A R M B E T W E E N T W O W A R S
serious question that the latter could be expected in the future to
perform traditional functions in connection with bombardment mis-
sions. As he explained:
During these exercises, observation aviation appeared woefully obsolete in
performance, as did pursuit aviation in speed characteristics. Since new bom-
bardment aircraft possesses speed above two hundred miles per hour, any inter-
cepting o r supporting aircraft must possess greater speed characteristics if they
are to perform their missions. In the case of pursuit aviation, this increase of
speed must be so great as to make it doubtful whether pursuit aircraft can be
efficiently or safely operated either individually or in mass.
The answer to the problem thus posed was suggested in a statement
of first-rate importance to an understanding of ideas which subse-
quently governed the thinking of the Air Corps. “Bombardment avia-
tion,” General Westover observed, “has defensive fire power of such
quantity and effectiveness as to warrant the belief that with its modern
speeds it may be capable of effectively accomplishing its assigned
mission without support.” Indeed, the “ability of bombardment avia-
tion to fly in close formation and thus to insure greater defense
against air attack, together with improved efficiency of silencers and
camouflage,” argued that “no known agency can frustrate the accom-
plishment of a bombardment mission.” lS6
That the bomber would have the first call in the development of
new equipment, and that the trend of thought favored a combination
of the reconnaissance and bombardment function in one plane, was
suggested by an engineering study, undertaken in July 1933 by the Ma-
teriel Division at Wright Field, of the problem of “maximum range”
with “a 2,000 pound bomb load.” The result of that study indicated
that a range of 5,000 miles at a speed of 2 0 0 miles per hour was prac-
ticable. Accordingly, in December the Air Corps submitted to the
War Department in its so-called Project A a proposal to build a
plane of that range. In support of the proposal it was pointed out that
such a plane would “not alone reinforce either coast line.. . but would
definitely enable.. .reinforcement of.. . Panama and Hawaii.” l S 7
T h e action of the War Department General Staff was prompt
enough. Tentative approval having been given on 19 December 1933,
a $609,300 Air Corps budget for long-range bomber development was
approved “in principle” on 1 2 February 1934, and on 1 2 May the
Chief of Staff authorized the negotiation of contracts with the Boeing
and Martin companies for preliminary designs and engineering
65