Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
the Interior. The Administrative History Branch, which he headed
throughout the war, would retain in its title the emphasis fixed by the
President’s directive for the preparation of administrative histories by
war agencies, but the responsibility of the branch actually included
comprehensive study of all phases of the AAF’s continental, as distinct
from its overseas, activities. It was Colonel Williams’ hope that he
might himself assume the major responsibility for coverage of over-
seas operations, and in the fall of 1942 he spent two months on tem-
porary duty in England, where, in addition to studying the practical
problems to be met in covering an overseas air force, he drew heavily
upon the experience of the well-established historical section of the
British Air Ministry. T o Mr. J. C. Nerney on this and other occasions,
and as well to historical officers of the Royal Air Force, the Royal
Canadian Air Force, the Royal Australian Air Force, and the Royal
New Zealand Air Force, with whom AAF historical personnel were
associated in the study of combined air operations, there is due an
acknowledgment of a variety of courtesies extended. After returning
to Headquarters at the close of 1942, Colonel Williams found the
pressure of a growing administrative burden such that in the fail of
1943 he turned over to a newly established Operational History
Branch, headed by Lt. Col. Wesley F. Craven, much of the responsi-
bility for coverage of overseas operations. In August 1945 the His-
torical Division was removed from Intelligence and given the status
of a special staff office.
The proportions of the task which had been assigned to it were
staggering. By the close of 1942 there were already twelve air forces,
eight of them engaged in widely scattered overseas operations, while
in this country the training and service commands alone dwarfed most
organizations theretofore known to American military history. Even-
tually there would be sixteen separate air forces whose several oper-
ations extended literally around the world, not to mention the Air
Transport Command, which pioneered in the development of the
first world-wide system of air transport. The rapidly accumulating
records of this varied activity were not only massive; they were also
scattered. The basic problem was to devise some scheme of selection
that would permit the assembly in usable form of that part of the
record which had clear historical significance and at the same time,
paradoxically, to supplement the record by capturing and recording
experiences that otherwise would be lost. Basic also was the factor of
X

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.