Documents / Hearing transcript

Symposium on unidentified flying objects: hearings before the Committee on Science and Astronautics, U.S. House of Representatives, Ninetieth Congress, second session, July 29, 1968.

U.S. House of Representatives · 1968-07-29 · 256 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is the printed record of a July 29, 1968 symposium on unidentified flying objects held by the Committee on Science and Astronautics of the U.S. House of Representatives, chaired by Rep. J. Edward Roush. The committee heard statements from six scientists: J. Allen Hynek, James E. McDonald, Carl Sagan, Robert L. Hall, James A. Harder and Robert M. L. Baker. It also printed papers from Donald Menzel, Stanton Friedman, Frank Salisbury and others. Hynek argued that puzzling UFO reports from competent witnesses deserve serious scientific study.

  • p. 12 …in a peasant society whose eyes were never turned toward the skies. Can we afford not…
  • p. 13 …for a proper and definitive study will never develop. I recall an encounter I had sometime…
  • p. 16 …A very character- istic statement by those making the reports is: "I have never seen anything…
  • p. 18 …They also usually request anonymity which is always granted. (4) UFO's are never seen at…
  • p. 19 …Other misconceptions are that UFO's are never reported by scien- tifically trained people, are never…
  • p. 20 …it has never been considered worthwhile to improve the data -gathering process because the whole subject…
  • p. 27 …he is looking at something he has never seen before. I like Dr. Hynek's phrase…
  • p. 37 …at the Ontario Hydro Commission plant has never been identified, but initially thetentative suspicion was centered…
  • p. 39 …cover- ing innumerable intriguing cases I had never before heard of, and (above all) after the…
  • p. 43 …diminish in sig- nificance, though they can never be overlooked. A frequent objection to serious consideration…
  • p. 45 …out- of-the-way rural areas but never over large cities? Why don't large groups…
  • p. 48 …Smith emphasized that they were never certain of sizes and distances, but that they had the…
  • p. 53 …is deceased), I believe that there has never been any dispute as to the observed facts…
  • p. 59 …Many other sources could be cited to show that the intimation that UFOs are never seen…
  • p. 65 …After the 'official "explanation" was publicized, he decided he'd never report another one. I predict…
  • p. 68 …In the ensuing two decades, he has never again seen anything like it. Clearly, the probability…
  • p. 69 …Moore never got a sufficiently clear view to identify any finer details if any were present…
  • p. 75 …the past twenty years, cases that ought never have been so labelled, had the evaluators kept…
  • p. 76 …Ground radar stations never detected the unknown that was seen visually and contacted by airborne radar…
  • p. 77 …strong, bright pips, said that "anomalous propagation never entered our heads as an explanation." Howard S…
  • p. 78 …7) but could never close with the unknown as its continued on its north- bound course…
  • p. 80 …All three said they had never before seen anything like it. Munger decided to phone his…
  • p. 81 …The photos were shortly taken by Base military authorities and were never seen again by the…
  • p. 87 …referred to repeatedly in Menzel's writings, never with any quantitative discussion of precisely what he…
  • p. 100 …visual observations of classical UFO's have never been made by profes- sional astronomers. For example…
  • p. 101 …how the promised political or social intervention never materializes. Psychological Factors. The psychologist Carl Jung pointed…
  • p. 125 …Oh, heavens, I never suggested that, I hope. Mr. BOONE. Well, let me say, science fiction…
  • p. 159 …He has not ever been exposed to any toxic substances, has never had to take any…
  • p. 168 …He said he had never had the experience of deja-vu episodes or of performing acts…
  • p. 171 …It never occurred to him to call anyone else's attention to the light (probably because…
  • p. 172 …He had never seen anything like it before and in fact had never previously had the…
  • p. 173 …He has taken only two sick days in the entire five years and is never late…
  • p. 174 …He never has fantasied actively taking his own life, however, and feels it would be very…
  • p. 175 …He never was one to participate in extracurricular activities, but always maintained a part-time job…
  • p. 176 …Prior to seeing that light, he apparently never experienced a deja vu, or any illusory or…
  • p. 194 …If the observer being studied is truly sociopathic and has never de- veloped a super -ego…
  • p. 203 197 This data, which most people have never seen or even heard of, is published in…
  • p. 206 …They never have had enough sCientists in the project. They have failed to follow up certain…
  • p. 221 …Isn't it true that UFOs have never been sighted on radar? No, it is not…
  • p. 243 …make such an all- inclusive negative statement. Never- theless, many of the arguments are highly compelling…
  • p. 244 …A balloon reported as a UFO was never out of sight of its launchers. A perplexing…
  • p. 247 …al- though he apologizes because he has never had the time to make a thorough search…
  • p. 249 …two leads appeared, but other witnesses could never be located), but his ap- parent sincerity was…
88
with another
dish, similarly
outfitted if
one
existed
at
the
incredible
distance
of
1,000 light
years
away,
a
light
year
being
about
6.6
trillion
miles,
and
the
distance
to
the
nearest
star
being
a
little
over
4
lightyears.
Now,
let
me
then
go
to
the
question
of
the
cosmic
perspective
of
where
we
are.
We
are,
of
course,
sitting
on a
planet,
the
third
from
the
Sun,
which
is
going
around
the
Sun,
which
is
a
star
-like,
and
the
other
stars
visible
on
a
clear
night to the
naked
eye.
The
first
small
slide
will
give
an
impression
of
what
happens
when
you
point
a
moderate
telescope
in
the
direction
of
the
center
of
the
Milky
Way
Galaxy.
This
is
a
photograph of
a
star
cloud.
You
are
looking
at tens
of
thousands
of suns
here.
In
fact,
the
number
of suns
in
our
galaxy
is
about
150,000
million.
They
are
collected
into
a
disk
-shaped
pattern,
shown
in
the
next
slide;
the
next
slide
will
show
a
photograph of
the
nearest
galaxy
like
our
own. That
fuzzy
spiral
thing
in
the
middle
is
M-31,
that
is
also
known
as the
Great
Galaxy
Andromeda,
and
if
that
were
a
photo-
graph
of our
galaxy,
we
would
be
situated
extremely far
out,
in
fact,
a
little
far
off
the
slide,
very
much
in
the
galactic
boon
docks.
The
Sun
is
nowhere
near
the
center
of
the galaxy.
It
is
a
very
out-of-the-
way
rural
location
we
happen
to
be
in.
Now,
in
collection
of
150,000
million
stars in
the
Milky
Way
Galaxy,our sun
is
just
one,
and
there are
at
least billions
of
other
gallaxies,
and
the
last
slide,
-
will
show
you
what
happens
if
you
point
a
tele-
scope
away
from
the obscuring dust
and
stars
in
the galaxy.
You
then
start
seeing
dozens
of
other
galaxies.
everyone of
those
funny
-shaped
spiral
and
irregular
-shaped things
there,
and some
of
the
spherical
-
shaped
ones, are other
galaxies,
each
of which
are containing
about
100
billion
stars
as
well.
So
it is
clear
that there are in
the
accessible
universe,
some
hundredsof
billions
of
billions
of
stars,
all
more
or
less
like
our
own.
Now,
if
we
want
to
assess
the
likelihood
that there are
intelligentcivilizations
somewhere
in
advance of our
own,
on
planets
of
other
stars
in
our
own
galaxy,
we
have
to
ask
questions
which
cover
a
variety
of
scientific
subjects,
some
of which
are
fairly
well
known, some
of
which
are
extremely poorly
known. For a
numerical assessment
of
whether
there
is
likely intelligence
in other parts
of the
galaxy
in
a
form
we
do
not have
at present,
let
me
indicate
the
kinds of
things
we
know.
It
depends
on
the
rate
of
star
formation.
It depends
on
the
likelihood
that the given
star
has
planets.
It de-
pends
on
the
likelihood
at
least
one of
those planets
is
at
a
position
from
the
essential
star
which
is
suitable
for the
origin
of
life.
It
de-
pends on
the
likelihood
that the
origin
of
life
actually occurs
on
thatplanet.
It depends on
the
probability
life
once
arisen
on
that planetwill
evolve to
some
intelligence.
It depends on
the
likelihood
that
in-
telligence,
once emerged,
will
develop
a
technical
civilization.
And
it
depends on
the
lifetime
of the technical
civilization,
because technicalcivilization
of a
very short
lifetime, will result
in very
few
technical
cvilizations
being around at
any
given time.
We
know
something about
some of
these.
There
is
some
reason to believe that planets are
a
reason-

Cases discussed

About this file

Hearing transcript, from the govinfo collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 256 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.