“Nevers”43 pages
- p. 12 …in a peasant society whose eyes were never turned toward the
skies.
Can we afford not…
- p. 13 …for
a
proper
and
definitive
study
will
never
develop.
I
recall
an
encounter
I
had
sometime…
- p. 16 …A
very
character-
istic
statement
by
those
making
the
reports
is:
"I
have
never
seen
anything…
- p. 18 …They also usually request anonymity which is always granted.
(4) UFO's are never seen at…
- p. 19 …Other misconceptions are that UFO's are never reported by scien-
tifically trained people, are never…
- p. 20 …it
has never been
considered
worthwhile
to
improve
the data
-gathering process
because the
whole
subject…
- p. 27 …he is looking at something he has never seen before.
I like Dr. Hynek's phrase…
- p. 37 …at the Ontario
Hydro
Commission
plant has never been
identified,
but
initially
thetentative suspicion
was
centered…
- p. 39 …cover-
ing innumerable intriguing cases I had never before heard of, and (above all)
after the…
- p. 43 …diminish in sig-
nificance, though they can never be overlooked.
A frequent objection to serious consideration…
- p. 45 …out-
of-the-way rural
areas but never over large
cities?
Why
don't
large
groups…
- p. 48 …Smith
emphasized
that they
were
never
certain
of
sizes
and
distances,
but
that they
had
the…
- p. 53 …is deceased), I believe that there
has never been any dispute as to the observed facts…
- p. 59 …Many
other sources could
be
cited
to
show
that
the
intimation
that
UFOs
are never
seen…
- p. 65 …After the 'official "explanation" was publicized, he decided
he'd never report another one. I predict…
- p. 68 …In the ensuing two decades, he has never again seen anything like
it. Clearly, the probability…
- p. 69 …Moore
never got
a
sufficiently
clear
view to
identify
any
finer details if
any were
present…
- p. 75 …the past
twenty
years,
cases
that
ought
never
have
been
so
labelled,
had
the
evaluators
kept…
- p. 76 …Ground
radar
stations
never
detected
the
unknown
that
was
seen
visually
and
contacted
by
airborne radar…
- p. 77 …strong, bright pips, said that
"anomalous propagation never entered our heads as an explanation."
Howard S…
- p. 78 …7)
but
could
never
close
with the
unknown
as
its
continued
on
its
north-
bound
course…
- p. 80 …All three said
they
had
never
before
seen anything
like
it.
Munger
decided
to
phone
his…
- p. 81 …The
photos
were
shortly
taken
by
Base
military
authorities
and
were
never
seen again by
the…
- p. 87 …referred to repeatedly in Menzel's
writings,
never with
any
quantitative discussion
of
precisely
what he…
- p. 100 …visual
observations
of
classical
UFO's
have
never been
made
by
profes-
sional
astronomers.
For
example…
- p. 101 …how the promised political or social intervention never materializes.
Psychological Factors. The psychologist Carl Jung pointed…
- p. 125 …Oh,
heavens,
I
never suggested that,
I
hope.
Mr. BOONE.
Well,
let
me
say,
science fiction…
- p. 159 …He
has not ever been exposed
to any toxic substances,
has never
had
to take
any…
- p. 168 …He
said
he
had
never
had
the
experience
of
deja-vu episodes
or
of
performing
acts…
- p. 171 …It never occurred to him to call anyone else's attention to the
light (probably because…
- p. 172 …He
had
never
seen
anything
like
it
before
and
in
fact
had
never
previously
had
the…
- p. 173 …He has taken
only two sick days in the entire five years and is never late…
- p. 174 …He never has fantasied actively
taking his own life, however, and feels it would be very…
- p. 175 …He never was one to participate in extracurricular activities,
but always maintained a part-time job…
- p. 176 …Prior
to
seeing
that light, he
apparently never
experienced
a
deja
vu, or
any
illusory
or…
- p. 194 …If
the
observer
being
studied
is
truly sociopathic
and
has
never
de-
veloped
a
super
-ego…
- p. 203 197
This
data,
which
most
people
have
never
seen
or
even heard
of,
is
published in…
- p. 206 …They
never
have
had
enough
sCientists
in
the
project.
They
have
failed
to
follow
up
certain…
- p. 221 …Isn't it true that UFOs have never been sighted on radar?
No, it is not…
- p. 243 …make such an all-
inclusive negative statement. Never-
theless, many of the arguments are
highly compelling…
- p. 244 …A balloon
reported as a UFO was never out of
sight of its launchers. A perplexing…
- p. 247 …al-
though he apologizes because he has
never had the time to make a thorough
search…
- p. 249 …two
leads appeared, but other witnesses
could never be located), but his ap-
parent sincerity was…
SYMPOSIUM
ON
UNIDENTIFIED
FLYING OBJECTS
MONDAY,
JULY
29,
1968
HOUSE
OF
REPRESENTATIVES,
COMMITTEE ON
SCIENCE
AND
ASTRONAUTICS
ashington,D.0
D.C.
The
committee
met,
pursuant
to
notice,
at
10:05
a.m.,
in
room
2318,
Rayburn House
Office
Building,
Hon.
J.
Edward
Roush
(chairmanof
the
symposium)
presiding.
Mr.
Rousx.
The
committee
will
be
in order.
Today
the
House
Committee on
Science
and
Astronautics
conducts
a
very
special session,
a
symposium on
the
subject
of
unidentified
flying objects;
the
name
of which
is
a
reminder
to
us of
our
ignorance
on
this
subject
and
a
challenge to acquire
more
knowledge
thereof.
We
approach
the
question
of
unidentified flying objects
as purely
a
scientific
problem, one of unanswered
questions.
Certainly
the
rigid
and
exacting
discipline
of
science
should be marshaled
to
explore
the nature
of
phenomena
which
reliable citizens
continue
to
report.
•
A
significant
part
of
the
problem has
been
that the
sightings
re-
ported
have
not
been
accompanied
by
so-called
hardware
or
materials
that could
be
investigated
and
analyzed.
So we
are
left
with
hypo-
theses
about
the nature
of
UFO's.
These
hypotheses
range
from
the
conclusion
that
they
are purely
psychological
phenomena,
that
is,
some
kind of
hallucinatory
phenomena;
to
that
of
some
kind of
natural physical
phenomena;
to
that
of advanced
technological
ma-
chinery
manned by some
kind
of
intelligence,
that
is,
the
extrater-
restrial
hypotheses.
With
the
range
in
mind,
then,
we
have
invited six
outstanding
scientists
to
address
us today,
men who
deal
with the
physical,
the
psychological,
the
sociological,
and
the
technological
data
relevant
to
the
issues
involved.
We
welcome
them and
look
forward
to
their
remarks.
Additionally
we
have
requested several
other
scientists
to
make
their presentations
in the
form
of papers
to
be
added
to
these
when
published
by
the committee.
We
take
no
stand
on
these matters.
Indeed,
we
are here
today
to
listen
to
their
assessment
of
the nature of
the
problem ;
to
any
tenta-
tive
conclusions
or
suggestions
they
might
offer,
so that
our judg-
ments and our
actions
might
be based
on
reliable
and
expert informa-
tion.
We
are here to
listen
and
to learn.
Events of the
last
half century
certainly verify the
American
philosopher,
John Dewey's
conclusion that
"Every
great
advancein science
has
issued
from a
new
audacity of imagination."
With an
open and
inquiring attitude,
then,
we now
turn to
our speakers for
the day.
(1)