Documents / Hearing transcript

Symposium on unidentified flying objects: hearings before the Committee on Science and Astronautics, U.S. House of Representatives, Ninetieth Congress, second session, July 29, 1968.

U.S. House of Representatives · 1968-07-29 · 256 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is the printed record of a July 29, 1968 symposium on unidentified flying objects held by the Committee on Science and Astronautics of the U.S. House of Representatives, chaired by Rep. J. Edward Roush. The committee heard statements from six scientists: J. Allen Hynek, James E. McDonald, Carl Sagan, Robert L. Hall, James A. Harder and Robert M. L. Baker. It also printed papers from Donald Menzel, Stanton Friedman, Frank Salisbury and others. Hynek argued that puzzling UFO reports from competent witnesses deserve serious scientific study.

  • p. 18 …Some of these statements which lead to mis- conceptions are: —(1) Only UFO "buffs" report UFO…
  • p. 19 …One great misconception is that only UFO buffs report UFO's; quite the opposite is the…
  • p. 25 …saw their very impressive and sur- prising UFO files, the pattern of which is entirely different…
  • p. 39 …files and modes of operation of both private and official (i.e., Project Bluebook) UFO investigative…
  • p. 41 …Misinter- preted natural phenomena (Hypothesis 3) do explain many sincerely -submitted UFO reports; but, as I…
  • p. 45 …It summarizes about 750 UFO cases in the NICAP files up to about
  • p. 46 …Reference 7 is another now -accessible source of extremely significant UFO documentation; it is unfortunate that…
  • p. 54 …Longview, Wash., July 8, 1949 Many of the UFO cases I am citing are drawn intentionally…
  • p. 60 54 terrestrial hypothesis for UFOs, incomprehensibility must be expected as almost inevitable. Hence there is more…
  • p. 63 …NICAP files. The article, by Post reporter Jimmie Woods, represents one of those rare UFO feature…
  • p. 68 …5) remarks that an astronomer working under con- tract to the official UFO investigatory program interviewed…
  • p. 70 …UFO sightings by meteorologists could be extended very con- siderably by drawing on my file of…
  • p. 72 …the UFO problem in the ensuing two-year period. Many details from the official file on…
  • p. 75 …In my files are many other "balloon" cases from the past twenty years, cases that ought…
  • p. 76 …The third target was spotted visually by myself," Hemphill's signed statement in the case -file…
  • p. 78 …25), who evidently drew his information from the official files. Ruppelt (Ref. 5) states that when…
  • p. 79 …unknowns in official files to be ignored. A famous case in UFO annals involved a B…
  • p. 86 …explanations for classic UFO cases that have been made in the official files in the last…
  • p. 91 …Official file on October 15, 1948 Fukuoka case, Project Bluebook. 43. Melbourne (Australia) Sun, December 16…
  • p. 120 …During that night, and several succeeding nights, there were many reports of UFO's over northern…
  • p. 128 …THE UFO PROPULSION PROBLEM By way of introducing the propulsion problem of UFO's, I will…
  • p. 185 179 rod N.T.TuDE tOURIE 3• MOTION OF UFO SYSTIM a..„. — 73 2.3 2…
  • p. 206 …for a UFO. This viewpoint is absolutely nonsense and the Air Force files bear witness to…
  • p. 207 …But such behavior does not imply, as the UFO addicts argue, the presence of an intelligence…
  • p. 208 …He watches the UFO for a minute or two until it finally disappears. He cannot be…
  • p. 218 …UFO presence. This can be done with existing information. Up- date and upgrade the files with…
  • p. 224 …claimed to have observed a UFO. Interestingly enough the official files con- tain fewer than 12…
  • p. 239 …Indeed, at present the scientific study of the UFO problem is greatly hampered by the circumstance…
  • p. 244 …The dotted line represents "re- liable" sightings in the files of the Aerial Phenomena Research Organization…
  • p. 245 …Many radar sightings of UFO's are on file. In a few cases, a UFO has…
  • p. 247 …He states that he has on file more than 300 UFO sightings prior to the 20th…
18
(The biography of Dr.McDonald follows:)
DR. JAMES E. MCDONAI,D
Born: Duluth, Minn., May 7, 1920.
Home Address: 3461 East Third St., Tucson, Ariz.
Education:
University of Omaha, Omaha,Nebraska, B.A. (Chemistry) 1942.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass. (Meterology) 1945.
Iowa State University, Ames,Ia., Ph.D.(Physics) 1951.
Professional Career:
Instructor, Dept. of Physics,Iowa State University, 1946-49.
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Physics, Iowa State University, 1950-53.
Research physicist, Cloud Physics Project, University of Chicago, 1953-54.
Associate Professor, Dept. of Physics, University of Arizona, 1954-56, Pro-
fessor, 1956-57.
Associate director, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, University of Arizona,
1954-57.
Professor, Dept. of Meteorology, and Senior Physicist, Institute of Atmos-
pheric Physics,1958 to present.
Other activities:
U.S. Navy,1942-45, naval intelligence and aerology.
Member, Panel on Weather and Climate Modification, National Academy
of Sciences, 1905-present.
Member, ESSA-Navy Project Stormfury Advisory Panel, 1966-present.
Member, American Meteorological Society Commission on Publications, 1966-
present.
Member, Advisory panel for weather modification, National Science Founda-
tion, 1967-present.
Professional memberships:
American Association for Advancement of Science, American Meteorological
Society, Sigma Xi, American Geophysical Union, Royal Meteorological
Society, Arizona Academy of Science, American Association of University
Professors.
Personal: Married,1945, Betsy Hunt: six children.
Fields of special interest: Atmospheric physics, physics of clouds and precipita-
tion, meterological optics, atmospheric electricity, weather modification,
unidentified aerial phenomena.
STATEMENT OF DR. JAMES E. McDONALD, SENIOR PHYSICIST,
INSTITUTE OF ATMOSPHERIC PHYSICS, AND PROFESSOR, DE-
PARTMENT OF METEOROLOGY, THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA,
TUCSON, ARIZ.
Dr.MCDONALD.Thank you,Mr.Roush.
I am very pleased to have this chance to make some comments and
suggestions based on my own experience to the committee, and I do
wish to commend the Committee on Science and Astronautics for tak-
ing this first, and I hope very significant step, to look at the problem
that has puzzled many for 20 years.
As Dr. Hynek has emphasized in his remarks, it is one of the diffi-
culties of the problem we are talking about today that the scientific
community, not just in the United States but on a world basis, has
tended to discount and to regard as nonsense the UFO problem. The
fact that so much anecdotal data is involved has understandly discour-
aged many scientists from taking seriously what,in fact, I believe is a
matter of extraordinary scientific importance.
I have been studying now for about 2 years, on a rather intensive
basis, the UFO problem. I have interviewed several hundred wit-
nesses in selected cases, and I am astonished at what I have found. I

Cases discussed

About this file

Hearing transcript, from the govinfo collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 256 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.